NATURE'S CAPACITIES AND THEIR MEASUREMENT
By D. Braddon-Mitchell. 1991
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Josh Tenenbaum
- Yoshua Bengio
- David Lopez-Paz
- T. Griffiths
- Jan Peters
- Dacheng Tao
- Sergey Levine
Citations in the corpus
- Simpson's Paradox in COVID-19 Case Fatality Rates: A Mediation Analysis of Age-Related Causal Effects (2020, background): “In other words, choosing a model is a problem that needs to be addressed before starting to carry out any causal analysis: “no causes in, no causes out” Cartwright et al. (1994). However, once specified the causal model dictates how to interpret the data, thus effectively resolving any apparent “par”
- A theory of causal learning in children: causal maps and Bayes nets. (2004, background): “Causal knowledge plays a central role in theories both in science (Cartwright, 1989; Salmon, 1984) and in everyday life (Gopnik & Wellman, 1994; Gopnik & Glymour, 2002).”
- From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. (1997, background): “These assumptions specify the focal sets reasoners prefer for computing contrast: those in which plausible alternative causes are controlled (cf. Cartwright , 1989; Salmon, 1980).”
- Building Micro-Foundations for the Routines, Capabilities, and Performance Links (2007, unknown): “There are no macro-level entities on the social domain that somehow possess capacities or dispositions to act (Cartwright, 1989) that make them capable of directly producing macro-level outcomes and there are no processes of interaction between macro-entities that take place on this level.”
- Unpredictability in economic analysis, econometric modeling and forecasting (2014, background): “To paraphrase Cartwright (1989), ‘Breaks out (as in (21)) need breaks in (as in (23))’, so it cannot be logically impossible to foresee some shifts—though it may be difficult in practice.”
- Statistics and causal inference: A review (2003, background): “Cartwright (1989) expressed this principle 2Even the theory of stochastic processes, which provides probabilistic characterization of certain dynamic phenomena, assumes a fixed density function over time-indexed variables.”
- Toward a Unified Theory of Causality (2008, unknown): “Also see Cartwright (1989); Eells (1991); Eells and Sober (1983); Good (1961, 1962); Lewis (2000); Menzies (2004); Pearl (2000); Skyrms (1980); Suppes (1970).”
- Detecting blickets: how young children use information about novel causal powers in categorization and induction. (2000, background): “In fact, theoretical entities and categories in science are usually defined by their causal role (see e.g., Cartwright, 1989; Salmon, 1984).”
- Causal inference (1991, background): “If the causal graph were in turn a function of the population P(V), then P(V||P’(V)) could still be calculated from P(V) alone.”
- A Multilingual Perspective on Translanguaging (2017, background): “‘‘Frictionless planes, point masses, infinite velocities, isolated systems, omniscient agents, and markets in perfect equilibrium are but some well-known examples’’ of scientific idealization (Frigg & Hartmann, 2012; see also Cartwright, 1989; Nowak, 1972, 1992).”
- A Survey of Learning Causality with Data: Problems and Methods (2018, background): ““No causes in, no causes out”, the famous quote fromCartwright [22] summarizes the procedure of learning causality with data.”
- A dispositional theory of possibility (2008, background): “As far as we can tell, ‘capacity’ realists fall into this group as well; they include: Cartwright 1999 and Cartwright 1989; Dupré 1993.”
- What are randomised controlled trials good for? (2009, background): “In this case the conditioning factors for deciding if C causes E need to include a dummy variable that takes value 1 just in case C has operated to produce the paired effect and the value 0 otherwise (Cartwright 1989, 2007).”