Diagnostic Expectations and Stock Returns

By P. Bordalo, N. Gennaioli, R. La Porta, A. Shleifer. Journal of Finance, 2019

264 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We revisit La Porta's finding that returns on stocks with the most optimistic analyst long‐term earnings growth forecasts are lower than those on stocks with the most pessimistic forecasts. We document the joint dynamics of fundamentals, expectations, and returns of these portfolios, and explain the facts using a model of belief formation based on the representativeness heuristic. Analysts forecast fundamentals from observed earnings growth, but overreact to news by exaggerating the probability of states that have become more likely. We find support for the model's predictions. A quantitative estimation of the model accounts for the key patterns in the data.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6dfd62d061a3b7e0f1ac8bbdf6d7b4df61160eae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Lasse Heje Pedersen
  2. Nicholas Barberis
  3. Doron Avramov
  4. Allan G. Timmermann
  5. Massimo Guidolin
  6. Arvind Krishnamurthy
  7. Michael W. Brandt
  8. Guofu Zhou

In Finance

  1. Nicholas Barberis
  2. Lasse Heje Pedersen
  3. Doron Avramov
  4. Allan G. Timmermann
  5. Massimo Guidolin
  6. A. Shleifer
  7. Jianfeng Yu
  8. Guofu Zhou

In Management Science and Operations Research

  1. Lasse Heje Pedersen
  2. Nicholas Barberis
  3. Bayram Veli Salur

Citations in the corpus