An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers.

By Jinliang Wang. Genetics, 2002

737 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6d9efe7a9ac3a9058ede523c67b276afdf1d0773

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

Applications of Linkage Disequilibrium and Association Mapping in Crop Plants (2007, neutral): “The relatedness amongst the individuals forming the population can be either estimated using pedigrees (Emik and Terrill 1949) or inferred using molecular markers (Blouin 2003; Lynch and Ritland 1999; Oliehoek et al. 2006; Wang 2002).”
New insights from fine‐scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations (2004, background): “It must be noted that many of these estimators (Li et al. 1993; Lynch & Milligan 1994; ′ar ′ar ′ar ′ar ′ar © 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Molecular Ecology, 13, 921–935 Lynch & Ritland 1999; Wang 2002) assume Hardy– Weinberg genotypic proportions and are thus a priori inadequate to study SGS where”
Why some species of birds do not avoid inbreeding: insights from New Zealand robins and saddlebacks (2009, positive): “Genetic relatedness is based on Wang’s (2002) estimator.”
Dispersal Patterns of Orang-utans (Pongo spp.) in a Bornean Peat-swamp Forest (2011, methodology): “We calculated 4 different relatedness indices (Li et al. 1993; Lynch and Ritland 1999; Queller and Goodnight 1989; Wang 2002) for all pairs of individuals using SPAGeDi (Hardy and Vekemans 2002).”
Kin-related spatial structure in brown bears Ursus arctos (2005, methodology): “We calculated pairwise genetic relatedness between pairs of individuals using Wang’s estimator ( Wang 2002 ) and the software SPAGeDi 1.0 (Hardy and Vekemans 2002).”
coancestry: a program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients (2011, methodology): “…for unrelated or loosely related dyads but are less accurate for highly related dyads than the Queller & Goodnight (1989), Li et al. (1993) and Wang (2002) Additionally, a simulation study also provides the distribution (and variance) of relatedness estimates for a given simulated value,…”
Efficient Control of Population Structure in Model Organism Association Mapping (2008, methodology): “…of molecular markers have been suggested, including a simple identical-by-state (IBS) allele-sharing matrix, an allele-frequency weighted IBS matrix (L ynch and R itland 1999), a maximum-likelihood kinship matrix (T homas and H ill 2000), and a Monte Carlo simulation-based matrix (W ang 2002).”
Applications of Linkage Disequilibrium and Association Mapping in Maize (2009, background): “The relatedness amongst the individuals forming the population can be either estimated using pedigrees (Emik and Terrill 1949) or inferred using molecular markers (Lynch and Ritland 1999; Wang 2002; Blouin 2003; Oliehoek et al. 2006).”
Can't get there from here: inferring kinship from pairwise genetic relatedness (2008, methodology): “However, each of these methods (e.g. Queller & Goodnight 1989; Lynch & Ritland 1999; Wang 2002) has inherent limitations (see discussions in van de Casteele et al. 2001; Thomas et al. 2002; Wang 2002; Blouin 2003; Thomas 2005; Fernández & Toro 2006).”
related: an R package for analysing pairwise relatedness from codominant molecular markers (2015, methodology): “This is particularly important because it is desirable to compare the performance of estimators to identify which one is most appropriate given the characteristics of each data set (Van de Casteele et al. 2001; Wang 2002; Csill (cid:1) ery et al. 2006).”
Genomic measures of relationship and inbreeding (2007, result): “Estimators of genomic relationships were compared ( Wang, 2002 ) and provided similar results unless the population was small or the markers had many alleles.”
spagedi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels (2002, background): “…coefficient closely related to the kinship coefficient) described in Queller & Goodnight (1989), Hardy & Vekemans (1999), Lynch & Ritland (1999) and Wang (2002); (iii) two estimators of the fraternity coefficient (a ‘four-genes’ relatedness coefficient defined in Lynch & Walsh 1998) described in…”