New insights from fine‐scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations

By X. Vekemans, Olivier J. Hardy. Molecular Ecology, 2004

1,244 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67891d3577c1ea7e664463d151648ec1f8829469

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Genetics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

The Ecological and Evolutionary Consequences of Clonality for Plant Mating (2010, background): “Although there is evidence that flowers at the periphery of clones produce more seed than those more centrally located (Free 1979, Wang et al. 2005), such effects have yet to be demonstrated for mating patterns.”
Do cities represent sources, sinks or isolated islands for urban wild boar population structure? (2017, methodology): “As suggested by the Vekemans & Hardy (2004), the kinship coefficient (Fij) (Loiselle et al. 1995) was chosen as a pairwise estimator of genetic relatedness, as it is a relatively unbiased estimator with low sampling variance.”
GENCLONE : a computer program to analyse genotypic data, test for clonality and describe spatial clonal organization (2006, methodology): “Following Vekemans & Hardy (2004) F ij (the average kinship for each distance class) and b (the slope of the regression) are estimated and tested for significance.”
Applications of landscape genetics in conservation biology: concepts and challenges (2010, background): “2010) as the spatial autocorrelation of allele frequencies generally decreases as distance increases (Vekemans and Hardy 2004).”
Using spatial Bayesian methods to determine the genetic structure of a continuously distributed population: clusters or isolation by distance? (2009, positive): “As suggested by Vekemans & Hardy (2004), Loiselle’s kinship coefficient ( F ij ) was chosen as a pairwise estimator of genetic relatedness, as it is a relatively unbiased estimator with low sampling variance.”
Vicariance patterns in the Mediterranean Sea: east–west cleavage and low dispersal in the endemic seagrass Posidonia oceanica (2007, methodology): “The methods described by Vekemans & Hardy (2004) were used to estimate the statistic Sp of the regression between the logarithm of geographical distance and the co-ancestry coefficient defined by Ritland (1996).”
Genetic effects of forest management practices: Global synthesis and perspectives (2014, background): “…number, aggregation and density of congeners and their spatial distribution, act to modify the genetic diversity and structure of a forest population (Oddou-Muratorio et al., 2011; Robledo-Arnuncio and Austerlitz, 2006; Restoux et al., 2008; Sagnard et al., 2011; Vekemans and Hardy, 2004).”
Do linear landscape elements in farmland act as biological corridors for pollen dispersal? (2010, background): “Journal compilation 2009 British Ecological Society by the dispersal of diaspores such as seeds and vegetative parts, but in most plant species pollen dispersal predominates (e.g. Vekemans & Hardy 2004).”
Ecology of plant speciation (2010, background): “Vekemans & Hardy (2004) advocated the Sp statistic—essentially, the rate of decline in genetic identity with the logarithm of distance, over the range where both are linearly related—as the preferred measure of the spatial scale of genetic differentiation.”
coancestry: a program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients (2011, background): “…captive populations (e.g. Jones et al. 2002; Sekino et al. 2004), studying spatial structure and isolation by distance (e.g. Hardy & Vekemans 2002; Vekemans & Hardy 2004), examining social structures and kin selection (e.g. Girman et al. 1997; Peters et al. 1999), inferring sex-based migration…”