The Diversity of European Vegetation: an overview of phytosociological alliances and their relationships to EUNIS habitats
By J. Rodwell, J. Schaminée, L. Mucina, S. Pignatii, J. Dring, D. Moss. 2002
256 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6d8dc6da4f85039d4d595071251d338dc6d575da
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- A. Dixon
- D. Faber-Langendoen
- D. Gigante
- C. Josse
- R. Bunce
- John Morrison
- T. Keeler-Wolf
- C. Loucks
Citations in the corpus
- Distribution mapping of world grassland types (2014, background): “quet ‘class’ widely used in Europe and elsewhere (Rodwell et al., 2002).”
- Diagnosis and syntaxonomic interpretation of Annex I Habitats (Dir. 92/43/ EEC) in Italy at the alliance level (2012, background): “The alliance level has been used several times to indicate the ecological context for threatened species and habitats (Papastergiadou et al., 1997; Rodwell et al., 2002; Stanova, 2003).”
- EcoVeg: a new approach to vegetation description and classification (2014, methodology): “Another difference is that the primary top Braun-Blanquet level, the class, contains many hundreds of units, e.g., 80 classes are reported for Europe alone by Rodwell et al. (2002), with no formal higher levels.”
- A standardized procedure for surveillance and monitoring European habitats and provision of spatial data (2007, background): “…for existing Pan-European habitat classifications (e.g., EUNIS (Davies and Moss (2002)), national habitat classifications (e.g. (MorilloFernandez 2003) and phytosociological associations (e.g., Rodwell et al. 2002) depending upon the objectives of the project and the experience of the surveyors.”