EcoVeg: a new approach to vegetation description and classification

By D. Faber-Langendoen, T. Keeler-Wolf, D. Meidinger, D. Tart, Bruce Hoagland, C. Josse, G. Navarro, S. Ponomarenko, J. Saucier, A. Weakley and 1 more. 2014

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e7a2bfb3885a548c12849ba80b73401896d5f76d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. Janet Franklin
2. J. Rodríguez
3. M. McCarthy
4. Mark A. Burgman
5. David A. Keith
6. Lucie Bland
7. J. Link
8. T. Brooks

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. David A. Keith
2. Janet Franklin
3. J. Rodríguez
4. M. McCarthy
5. Mark A. Burgman
6. Lucie Bland
7. J. Link
8. T. Brooks

In Plant Science

1. Janet Franklin
2. M. McCarthy
3. Mark A. Burgman
4. T. Brooks
5. Mathieu Rouget

Citations in the corpus

• Guidelines for the application of IUCN Red List of Ecosystems categories and criteria (2015, methodology): “This work is guided by recent research on classifications of terrestrial vegetation (Faber-Langendoen et al., 2014) and marine environments (Gregr et al.”
• The IUCN Red List of Ecosystems: Motivations, Challenges, and Applications (2015, background): “Vegetation types are often workable proxies for ecosystem types at terrestrial landscape scales; the macrogroup or group levels of classification could be appropriate for the global RLE (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2014; IUCN 2014a).”
• Distribution mapping of world grassland types (2014, methodology): “…plant species assemblages to classify stands into plant community types (e.g. ‘associations’, ‘alliances’) and, combined with physiognomy, into broader vegetation types (e.g. classes, divisions, formations) (UNESCO, 1973; Ellenberg, 1988; DiGregario & Janssen, 1998; Faber-Langendoen et al., 2014).”