Calanoid copepods versus cladocerans: Consumer effects on protozoa in lakes of different trophic status

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Comparison of pelagic food webs in lakes along a trophic gradient and with seasonal aspects: influence of resource and predation (2004, result): “This is supported by the studies of Burns and Schallenberg (Burns and Schallenberg, 2001) who demonstrated that calanoid copepods exhibited higher grazing rates than cladocerans on protists in the lakes of New Zealand.”
Cascading predation effects of Daphnia and copepods on microbial food web components (2003, background): “Studies on the effect of cladocerans and copepods on populations of protozoa in lakes have mostly shown significant impacts of both crustacean groups on ciliates and other microplankton (Adrian & Schneider-Olt, 1999; Burns & Schallenberg, 2001a; Yoshida et al., 2001).”
Mesozooplankton and microzooplankton grazing during cyanobacterial blooms in the western basin of Lake Erie (2012, background): “While microzooplankton can be consumed by mesozooplankton (Burns and Schallenberg, 2001), any such grazing did not alter microzooplankton grazing rates during blooms, a finding consistent with a study by Leonard and Paerl (2005).”