A History of Heterodox Economics: Challenging the Mainstream in the Twentieth Century

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Social Ecological Economics: Understanding the Past to See the Future (2011, background): “In micro economics, core theoretical ideas have set the stage in terms of price theory for over a century (see Lee 2009: 2–3), providing a restricted orthodox worldview.1 In macro economics, the type of subjects that dominate (e.g., money supply, unemployment and inflation) have seemed divorced…”
The Shallow or the Deep Ecological Economics Movement (2013, background): “University exams in mainstream economics departments have increasingly required ‘the’ correct answer to ‘the’ model and so prevented teaching students how to question, analyse or think laterally, let alone show awareness that there might be other models or no appropriate model at all, and no correct”
New foundations for ecological economics (2012, unknown): “Mainstream economics is then identified as having watered down or changed interdisciplinary research and heterodox concepts in order to make the results fit within and conform to its methodology and ideology (Earl, 2005; Lee, 2009).”
The UK research assessment exercise and the narrowing of UK economics (2013, background): “Finally, for the questionnaire surveys, see Harley and Lee 1997, Lee and Harley 1998, and Lee 2009B: Appendix A.20 and A.23.”