HOW THERMAL EVOLUTION AND MASS-LOSS SCULPT POPULATIONS OF SUPER-EARTHS AND SUB-NEPTUNES: APPLICATION TO THE KEPLER-11 SYSTEM AND BEYOND

By E. Lopez, Jon Fortney, N. Miller. 2012

281 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We use models of thermal evolution and extreme ultraviolet (XUV) driven mass loss to explore the composition and history of low-mass, low-density transiting planets. We investigate the Kepler-11 system in detail and provide estimates of both the current and past planetary compositions. We find that an H/He envelope on Kepler-11b is highly vulnerable to mass loss. By comparing to formation models, we show that in situ formation of the system is extremely difficult. Instead we propose that it is a water-rich system of sub-Neptunes that migrated from beyond the snow line. For the broader population of observed planets, we show that there is a threshold in bulk planet density and incident flux above which no low-mass transiting planets have been observed. We suggest that this threshold is due to the instability of H/He envelopes to XUV-driven mass loss. Importantly, we find that this mass-loss threshold is well reproduced by our thermal evolution/contraction models that incorporate a standard mass-loss prescription. Treating the planets' contraction history is essential because the planets have significantly larger radii during the early era of high XUV fluxes. Over time low-mass planets with H/He envelopes can be transformed into water-dominated worlds with steam envelopes or rocky super-Earths. Finally, we use this threshold to provide likely minimum masses and radial-velocity amplitudes for the general population of Kepler candidates. Likewise, we use this threshold to provide constraints on the maximum radii of low-mass planets found by radial-velocity surveys.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c9c749d0d2f764708373de213fa6649ef477bc9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Jon Fortney
  2. D. Charbonneau
  3. J. Owen
  4. Timothy Morton
  5. C. Mordasini
  6. J. Johnson
  7. Sara Seager
  8. N. Madhusudhan

In Instrumentation

  1. Jon Fortney
  2. D. Charbonneau
  3. Timothy Morton
  4. J. Owen
  5. J. Johnson
  6. J. Winn
  7. E. Gaidos
  8. J. Southworth

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Jon Fortney
  2. C. Mordasini
  3. J. Owen
  4. Y. Lithwick
  5. Leslie A. Rogers
  6. Timothy Morton
  7. Yanqin Wu
  8. Sheng Jin

Citations in the corpus