DENSITY AND ECCENTRICITY OF KEPLER PLANETS
By Yanqin Wu, Y. Lithwick. 2012
152 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We analyze the transit timing variations (TTV) obtained by the Kepler mission for 22 sub-Jovian planet pairs (19 published, 3 new) that lie close to mean motion resonances. We find that the TTV phases for most of these pairs lie close to zero, consistent with an eccentricity distribution that has a very low root-mean-squared value of e ∼ 0.01; but about a quarter of the pairs possess much higher eccentricities, up to e ∼ 0.1–0.4. For the low-eccentricity pairs, we are able to statistically remove the effect of eccentricity to obtain planet masses from TTV data. These masses, together with those measured by radial velocity, yield a best-fit mass–radius relation M ∼ 3 M⊕(R/R⊕). This corresponds to a constant surface escape velocity of ∼20 km s−1. We separate the planets into two distinct groups: “mid-sized” (those greater than 3 R⊕) and “compact” (those smaller). All mid-sized planets are found to be less dense than water and therefore must contain extensive H/He envelopes that are comparable in mass to that of their cores. We argue that these planets have been significantly sculpted by photoevaporation. Surprisingly, mid-sized planets, a minority among Kepler candidates, are discovered exclusively around stars more massive than 0.8 M☉. The compact planets, on the other hand, are often denser than water. Combining our density measurements with those from radial velocity studies, we find that hotter compact planets tend to be denser, with the hottest ones reaching rock density. Moreover, hotter planets tend to be smaller in size. These results can be explained if the compact planets are made of rocky cores overlaid with a small amount of hydrogen, ⩽1% in mass, with water contributing little to their masses or sizes. Photoevaporation has exposed bare rocky cores in cases of the hottest planets. Our conclusion that these planets are likely not water worlds contrasts with some previous studies. While mid-sized planets most likely accreted their hydrogen envelope from the proto-planetary disks, compact planets could have obtained theirs via either accretion or outgassing. The presence of the two distinct classes suggests that 3 R⊕ could be identified as the dividing line between “hot Neptunes” and “super-Earths.”
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7926dd4b2d862c4c7ab005e5d98c95c877e13dc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Jon Fortney
- J. Owen
- D. Charbonneau
- Timothy Morton
- J. Winn
- J. Johnson
- N. Madhusudhan
- Andrew W. Howard
Citations in the corpus
- THE MASS–RADIUS RELATION FOR 65 EXOPLANETS SMALLER THAN 4 EARTH RADII (2013, background): “That Wu & Lithwick (2013) also find MP/M⊕ ≈ 3 (RP/R⊕) suggests that the TTV masses might be reliably systematically lower, although Wu & Lithwick (2013) use analytic rather than numerical methods to estimate planet masses.”
- MAKE SUPER-EARTHS, NOT JUPITERS: ACCRETING NEBULAR GAS ONTO SOLID CORES AT 0.1 AU AND BEYOND (2014, background): “Most of their measured masses range from 5–10M⊕ (Wu & Lithwick 2013; Weiss & Marcy 2014) Because our model gas envelopes are not heated, they are especially susceptible to runaway; i.e., our calculated runaway times trun are strict lower bounds.”
- HOW ROCKY ARE THEY? THE COMPOSITION DISTRIBUTION OF KEPLER’S SUB-NEPTUNE PLANET CANDIDATES WITHIN 0.15 AU (2014, background): “The relationship between the radii and masses for sub-Neptune planets has also received attention (Wolfgang & Laughlin 2012; Wu & Lithwick 2013; Weiss & Marcy 2014), with the aim of illuminating the compositions of these planets.”
- DENSITIES AND ECCENTRICITIES OF 139 KEPLER PLANETS FROM TRANSIT TIME VARIATIONS (2013, methodology): “Such a correlation for Kepler candidates has been noted in Wu & Lithwick (2013) and Owen & Wu (2013).”
- The HARPS search for southern extra-solar planets (2018, background): “0.03) are on the order of magnitude of eccentricities found in Kepler multi-transiting systems that are close to resonances (eccentricities inferred using transit timing variations, see Wu & Lithwick 2013).”
- PROBABILISTIC MASS–RADIUS RELATIONSHIP FOR SUB-NEPTUNE-SIZED PLANETS (2015, methodology): “Wu & Lithwick (2013) derived masses using the amplitudes of sinusoidal TTVs for 22 planet pairs, and found M = 3R.”
- The California-Kepler Survey. III. A Gap in the Radius Distribution of Small Planets (2017, background): “In addition, detailed modeling of transit timing variations (TTVs) provided mass constraints for a large number of systems in specific architectures (e.g., Wu & Lithwick 2013; Hadden & Lithwick 2014, 2016).”
- HAZMAT. I. THE EVOLUTION OF FAR-UV AND NEAR-UV EMISSION FROM EARLY M STARS (2014, background): “The conditions inside the circumstellar disks of M dwarfs provide a favorable environment for the formation of low-mass planets close to the star (Wu & Lithwick 2013), as indicated by the ∼50% small planet occurrence rate around M dwarfs in the habitable zone (HZ; ≈0.1–0.4 AU; Bonfils et al. 2013;…”
- Atmospheric Escape and the Evolution of Close-In Exoplanets (2018, background): “…being entirely solid (e.g. Dressing et al. 2015); in other cases the planet has such a low density that it needs to have a significant (Earth radii or larger) atmosphere composed of Hydrogen/Helium gas (e.g. Wu & Lithwick 2013; Hadden & Lithwick 2014; Weiss & Marcy 2014; Jontof-Hutter et al. 2016).”
- The Occurrence and Architecture of Exoplanetary Systems (2014, methodology): “Wu & Lithwick (2013) applied this method to 22 pairs of small planets.”
- BREEDING SUPER-EARTHS AND BIRTHING SUPER-PUFFS IN TRANSITIONAL DISKS (2015, background): “Transit-timing analyses (Wu & Lithwick 2013) and radial velocity surveys (Weiss & Marcy 2014) have determined that the typical masses of super-Earths are ∼2–20M⊕.”
- KEPLER PLANETS: A TALE OF EVAPORATION (2013, background): “This has also been noticed by Ciardi et al. (2013) and Wu & Lithwick (2013).”
- THE RADIUS DISTRIBUTION OF PLANETS AROUND COOL STARS (2013, background): “…systems have been measured from the effects of mutual gravitational interactions (e.g. Cochran et al. 2011, Lithwick et al. 2012, Nesvorny et al. 2013) providing insight into the composition and atmospheric evolution of these planets (Wu & Lithwick 2013; Owen & Wu 2013; Lopez et al. 2012).”
- The Evaporation Valley in the Kepler Planets (2017, background): “Combining transit measurements of a planet’s radius with a measurement of its mass from transit-timing variations (TTVs, Carter et al. 2012; Wu & Lithwick 2013; Hadden & Lithwick 2014; Jontof-Hutter et al. 2016; Hadden & Lithwick 2016) or radial-velocity (RV) follow-up (e.g. Marcy et al. 2014;…”
- Spacing of Kepler Planets: Sculpting by Dynamical Instability (2015, methodology): “In particular, the latter assumption is reasonble because at collision, their relative velocities can be higher than their surface escape velocities (∼ 10− 20 km/ s, see, e.g. Wu & Lithwick 2013), since the Keplerian orbital speed is of order 100 km/ s at the relevant distance.”
- Multiple Disk Gaps and Rings Generated by a Single Super-Earth (2017, background): “These planets generally weigh less than 20M⊕, as determined from transit-timing analyses (e.g., Jontof-Hutter et al. 2014; Wu & Lithwick 2013) and radial velocity measurements (e.g., Weiss & Marcy 2014; Marcy et al. 2014; Dumusque et al. 2014; Dressing et al. 2015).”
- ECCENTRICITY FROM TRANSIT PHOTOMETRY: SMALL PLANETS IN KEPLER MULTI-PLANET SYSTEMS HAVE LOW ECCENTRICITIES (2015, methodology): “From TTVs a low eccentricity for the planet pair is also measured (Wu & Lithwick 2013).”
- MOST 1.6 EARTH-RADIUS PLANETS ARE NOT ROCKY (2014, background): “…themselves are a diverse sample; many have mass constraints derived from TTVs (e.g., Kepler-11b,c,d,e,f,g, Kepler-30b,c, Kepler-36b,c, and the Wu & Lithwick (2013) planets), while the rest have RV-derived mass constraints (e.g., Kepler-4b, Kepler-10b,c, Kepler-19b, Kepler-20b,c,d,…”