Sexuality in marriage, dating, and other relationships: A decade review
By F. Christopher, Susan Sprecher. 2000
503 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, General Health Professions
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c9948b82ed72ddcf59f6eb1bd944db8b55e4a36
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Victor X. Luevano
- Heather M. Adams
- P. Jonason
- Nicole B. Ellison
- Kristen P. Mark
- S. Russell
- Jennifer L. Gibbs
- L. Kurdek
In Gender Studies
- Nicole B. Ellison
- Jennifer L. Gibbs
- Rebecca Heino
- Kristen P. Mark
- S. Russell
- L. Kurdek
- Leanne K. Knobloch
- P. Jonason
In General Health Professions
Citations in the corpus
- The content of relational uncertainty within marriage (2008, background): “They also bolster theorizing that sexual compatibility is a key component of marital well-being (Christopher & Sprecher, 2000; Harvey,Wenzel, & Sprecher, 2004).”
- Emotional intimacy, sexual desire, and sexual satisfaction among partnered heterosexual men (2014, background): “Relationship quality has also been associated with sexual satisfaction (Christopher & Sprecher, 2000; HendersonKing & Veroff, 1994; Sprecher, 2002).”
- Conceptualizing positive adolescent sexuality development (2005, background): “The biggest recent change in adolescent sexual behavior may be that compared to prior cohorts, contemporary teen (heterosexual) sexual behavior is more frequently taking place within the context of romantic relationships ( Christopher & Sprecher, 2000 ).”
- The Role of Anticipated Future Interaction, Self-Disclosure, and Perceived Success in Internet Dating (2006, background): “…example, a review of research on traditional romantic relationships finds that “one characteristic that continues to distinguish gay male couples from both heterosexual married couples and lesbian couples is their higher rates and acceptance of nonmonogamy” (Christopher & Sprecher, 2000, p. 1008).”
- Self-Presentation in Online Personals (2006, background): “For example, a review of research on traditional romantic relationships finds that “one characteristic that continues to distinguish gay male couples from both heterosexual married couples and lesbian couples is their higher rates and acceptance of nonmonogamy” ( Christopher & Sprecher, 2000, p. 100”
- How the Dark Triad traits predict relationship choices (2012, background): “…(i.e., primarily sexual relationships that occur one time only; Cubbins & Tanfer, 2000; Fisher & Bryne, 1978) and serious romantic relationships (i.e., committed and presumably monogamous romantic relationships; Christopher & Sprecher, 2000; Li, Bailey, Kenrick, & Linsenmeier, 2002) as exemplars.”
- Differences Between Partners From Heterosexual, Gay, and Lesbian Cohabiting Couples (2006, background): “Having a positive view of one’s partner was expected to be positively linked to partner interactions, that is, to frequent sexual relations (Christopher & Sprecher, 2000; Link c-1), to equal distribution of household labor (Coltrane, 2000; Link c-2), and to infrequent conflict (Kurdek, 1992; Link…”
- The relative impact of individual sexual desire and couple desire discrepancy on satisfaction in heterosexual couples (2012, background): “Clinicians and scholars alike have long supported the link between sexual and relationship satisfaction (Butzer & Campbell, 2008 ; Byers, 2005 ; Christopher & Sprecher, 2000 ) and many have acknowledged that these two constructs are impacted by other variables such as individual sexual desire (By”