Familiar concepts and relationships in the conifers based on rbcL and matK sequence comparisons

By C. Quinn, R. Price, P. Gadek. 2002

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c993d66e8d87fdb37ac5bd7932e4bb19fac2f47

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Interspecific relationships and origins of Taxaceae and Cephalotaxaceae revealed by partitioned Bayesian analyses of chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences (2008, background): “Attempts at phylogenetic reconstruction of conifers, including Taxaceae and Cephalotaxaceae, from morphological data highlight the considerable homoplasy, and consequent weakness of character support for the hypotheses generated from such analyses (Quinn et al. 2002).”
Use of Simultaneous Analyses to Guide Fossil‐Based Calibrations of Pinaceae Phylogeny (2008, unknown): “Phylogenetic studies have recovered Pinaceae as sister to other extant conifers (Hart 1987; Chaw et al. 1997; Stefanovic et al. 1998; Quinn et al. 2002; Hilton and Bateman 2006; Rai et al. 2008), although molecular analyses have often found the conifers to be rendered paraphyletic by the inclusion…”
Seed ferns and the origin of angiosperms (2006, background): “…conifer families (setting aside Gnetales) is the same as that found by Doyle (1996), which differs from molecular trees (e.g., Magallón and Sanderson 2002, Quinn et al. 2002) only in that Podocarpaceae are linked with Pinaceae (based on two microsporangia per sporophyll) rather than Araucariaceae.”
Brief history of the gymnosperms: classification, biodiversity, phytogeography and ecology (2007, background): “Basal clades within conifers include first Pinaceae, which are sister group to all others, and second a clade comprising Araucariaceae and Podocarpaceae (Stefanovic et al. 1998; Gugerli et al. 2001).”
Inference of higher-order conifer relationships from a multi-locus plastid data set (2008, methodology): “Other phylogenetic studies find Phyllocladus to be nested among podocarps (Hart 1987; Kelch 1997, 1998; Conran et al. 2000), sister to the rest of the family (Kelch 1998; Quinn et al. 2002; Sinclair et al. 2002), or even a grade at the base of the family (Kelch 1998), generally with poor support.”
Integrating Molecular Phylogenetic and Paleobotanical Evidence on Origin of the Flower (2008, background): “Molecular relationships within conifers (not considering Gnetales) also have strong statistical support (Quinn et al. 2002), including the relationship of Podocarpaceae with Araucariaceae rather than Pinaceae, the only difference from the morphological result.”
Phylogenetic Analysis of Araucariaceae: Integrating Molecules, Morphology, and Fossils (2013, background): “…with previous phylogenetic hypotheses for the group (Chaw et al. 1997; Stefanovic et al. 1998; Bowe et al. 2000; Magallón and Sanderson 2002; Quinn et al. 2002; Rai et al. 2008; Leslie et al. 2012) and also with the recently proposed classification of Christenhusz et al. (2011), in which…”
Discordant mtDNA and cpDNA phylogenies indicate geographic speciation and reticulation as driving factors for the diversification of the genus Picea (2011, methodology): “Loci sampling The rbcL, trnK and trnTLF regions of the paternally inherited chloroplast genome were used herein and in previous conifer phylogenetic studies (e.g. rbcL and trnK regions: Wang et al. 1999; Quinn et al. 2002; trnTLF region: Wei and Wang 2003; Qiao et al. 2007).”