The effect of taxonomic resolution on the assessment of ecological water quality classes

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Delivering on a promise: integrating species traits to transform descriptive community ecology into a predictive science (2013, background): “The choice of resolu- tion would reflect the need for detail and practical limitations (Schmidt-Kloiber and Nijboer 2004).”
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols using benthic macroinvertebrates in Brazil: evaluation of taxonomic sufficiency (2010, background): “Box-and-whisker plots of site scores for reference (REF), intermediately impaired (INT), and impaired (IMP) and lack of taxonomic keys to all groups (Resh and McElravy 1993, Schmidt-Kloiber and Nijboer 2004).”
Taxonomic sufficiency: The influence of taxonomic resolution on freshwater bioassessments using benthic macroinvertebrates (2008, methodology): “To give one quantitative example, Schmidt-Kloiber and Nijboer (Schmidt-Kloiber and Nijboer 2004; citing Graf et al. 1995) reported that saprobic scores for Austrian Hydropsyche species range from 0.”
Cook book for the development of a Multimetric Index for biological condition of aquatic ecosystems: Experiences from the European AQEM and STAR projects and related initiatives (2006, background): “sampling, sorting, and proper determination of the sampled individuals ( Schmidt-Kloiber & Nijboer, 2004 ) is not considered further here, since this paper aims at describing the procedure that starts with metric”