Functional and Phylogenetic Approaches to Forecasting Species' Responses to Climate Change

By Lauren B. Buckley, Joel G. Kingsolver. 2012

238 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c5aba123a7bac55dab64db028b20b9eec255a8e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Heat stress and the fitness consequences of climate change for terrestrial ectotherms (2013, background): “…heterogeneity in the predicted responses of mid-latitude species to climate change highlights the importance of incorporating physiological information about thermal sensitivity into ecological forecasts (Deutsch et al. 2008; Williams et al. 2008; Buckley & Kingsolver 2012; Huey et al. 2012).”
Ecological and life-history traits explain recent boundary shifts in elevation and latitude of western North American songbirds (2014, background): “Diet generalists are often predicted to expand their ranges more in response to climate change because they are better able to take advantage of new food types they might encounter (Buckley, 2012).”
Morphological traits are linked to the cold performance and distribution of bees along elevational gradients (2016, background): “…thermal performance of organisms and determining their distribution in natural ecosystems might be valuable for understanding species geographical ranges and to predict their response to climatic changes (Gardner et al., 2011; Buckley & Kingsolver, 2012; Secord et al., 2012; Moritz & Agudo, 2013).”
Climate Change and Phenological Mismatch in Trophic Interactions Among Plants, Insects, and Vertebrates (2018, background): “…change–induced phenological mismatch have always stressed a need to quantify microevolution (Stenseth et al. 2002, Parmesan 2006, Visser 2008, Buckley & Kingsolver 2012), the study of individual plasticity, population variation, and the genetic bases for phenological strategies is in its…”
Ontario freshwater fishes demonstrate differing range‐boundary shifts in a warming climate (2014, background): “Additionally, few studies have investigated why some species ranges are changing, whereas others remain relatively stable (Angert et al., 2011; Buckley & Kingsolver, 2012).”
Where, why and how? Explaining the low‐temperature range limits of temperate tree species (2016, methodology): “…‘space for time’ approach, using climate and species distri- bution archives or morphological plant traits, the actual functional meaning of which remained unproven (e.g. Gegout 2005; Thuiller et al. 2006; Bellard et al. 2012; Buckley & Kingsolver 2012; Amano et al. 2014; Stahl, Reu & Wirth 2014).”
Plant–pollinator interactions and phenological change: what can we learn about climate impacts from experiments and observations? (2015, background): “…should allow projections and comparisons of spatial and temporal mismatch, albeit with the caveat that models are unlikely to account for all relevant environmental variables and that projections into novel conditions will therefore be imperfect (Wiens et al. 2009, Buckley and Kingsolver 2012).”
Plant Facilitation and Phylogenetics (2013, background): “Buckley & Kingsolver (2012) show that both traits and climate change responses tend to be phylogenetically conserved.”