Climate Change and Phenological Mismatch in Trophic Interactions Among Plants, Insects, and Vertebrates
By S. Renner, Constantin M. Zohner. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2018
522 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Phenological mismatch results when interacting species change the timing of regularly repeated phases in their life cycles at different rates. We review whether this continuously ongoing phenomenon, also known as trophic asynchrony, is becoming more common under ongoing rapid climate change. In antagonistic trophic interactions, any mismatch will have negative impacts for only one of the species, whereas in mutualistic interactions, both partners are expected to suffer. Trophic mismatch is therefore expected to last for evolutionarily short periods, perhaps only a few seasons, adding to the difficulty of attributing it to climate change, which requires long-term data. So far, the prediction that diverging phenologies linked to climate change will cause mismatch is most clearly met in antagonistic interactions at high latitudes in the Artic. There is limited evidence of phenological mismatch in mutualistic interactions, possibly because of strong selection on mutualists to have co-adapted phenological strategies. The study of individual plasticity, population variation, and the genetic bases for phenological strategies is in its infancy. Recent work on woody plants revealed the large imprint of historic climate change on temperature, chilling, and day-length thresholds used by different species to synchronize their phenophases, which in the Northern Hemisphere has led to biogeographic phenological regions in which long-lived plants have adapted to particular interannual and intermillennial amplitudes of climate change.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/715358bd9c5b4c307d5f7292fe899e3fbcd58316
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
- Robert J. Wilson
- R. Fox
- Ivan A. Janssens
- Yongshuo H. Fu
- D. Wagner
- F. Sánchez‐Bayo
- Kris A. G. Wyckhuys
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Robert J. Wilson
- R. Fox
- Ivan A. Janssens
- Yongshuo H. Fu
- D. Wagner
- Kris A. G. Wyckhuys
- F. Sánchez‐Bayo
Citations in the corpus
- Plant phenology and global climate change: Current progresses and challenges (2019, background): “…profoundly altered the timing of phenological events (Thackeray et al., 2016; Yang & Rudolf, 2010), which could desynchronize seasonal interactions among species, leading to considerable consequences for biodiversity and ecosystem primary productivity (Kharouba et al., 2018; Renner & Zohner, 2018).”
- Insect responses to global change offer signposts for biodiversity and conservation (2020, background): “…flight periods to earlier dates were positively correlated with abundance for species with more than one generation per year (Macgregor et al., 2019a), but currently there is a lack of consistent evidence for the effects of phenological change on insect abundance (Renner & Zohner, 2018).”