The evolution of egg rejection by cuckoo hosts in Australia and Europe

By N. Langmore, R. Kilner, Stuart H. M. Butchart, G. Maurer, Nicholas B. Davies, A. Cockburn, N. Macgregor, Anne Peters, M. Magrath, D. Dowling. 2005

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Animal Science and Zoology, Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c5573a7f0814562acaf3adc362a107ab28c5f7a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Animal Science and Zoology

1. A. Møller

In Ecology

1. J. Welbergen
2. E. Røskaft
3. M. Soler
4. A. Møller
5. G. Rudolfsen
6. A. Moksnes
7. N. Langmore
8. B. Stokke

Citations in the corpus

• Predictors of resistance to brood parasitism within and among reed warbler populations (2008, background): “Therefore, there is strong selection for evolving antiparasite adaptations, of which egg rejection is one of the main host defenses (Davies and Brooke 1989a, 1989b; Moksnes et al. 1990; Langmore et al. 2005).”
• Advances in the Study of Coevolution Between Avian Brood Parasites and Their Hosts (2014, background): “…of rejection behavior by vindictive parasites (Zahavi 1979, Soler et al. 1995, Hoover & Robinson 2007), physical constraints on egg recognition (Langmore et al. 2005, Antonov et al. 2011) or rejection (Moksnes et al. 1991, Underwood & Sealy 2006, Krüger 2011), or evolutionary lag following…”