Predictors of resistance to brood parasitism within and among reed warbler populations

By B. Stokke, Inge Hafstad, G. Rudolfsen, A. Moksnes, A. Møller, E. Røskaft, M. Soler. 2008

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a24c0523fb2a4f8fd6971166255ff4a180c7fe6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Nicholas B. Davies
2. N. Langmore
3. A. Cockburn
4. Andrew F. Russell
5. S. Jenkins
6. N. Dochtermann
7. R. Kilner
8. T. H. Clutton-Brock

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Andrew F. Russell
2. S. Jenkins
3. A. Cockburn
4. Nicholas B. Davies
5. N. Dochtermann
6. Daniel T. Blumstein
7. N. Dingemanse

Citations in the corpus

• Developing multiple hypotheses in behavioral ecology (2010, background): “Brood parasitism Warblers All possible AIC-based model ranking Stokke et al. (2008)”
• Cuckoo adaptations: trickery and tuning (2011, background): “…defence, egg rejection and chick rejection in places and at times when parasitism is more likely (e.g. nest defence: Lindholm & Thomas, 2000; Røskaft et al., 2002; Welbergen & Davies, 2009; egg rejection: Brooke, Davies & Noble, 1998; Stokke et al., 2008; chick rejection: Langmore et al., 2009a).”
• Flexible cuckoo chick-rejection rules in the superb fairy-wren (2009, background): “…other host species showing that the incidence of egg rejection is higher when the likelihood of parasitism is greater (Davies and Brooke 1988; Moksnes and Røskaft 1989; Moksnes et al. 1993; Davies et al. 1996; Brooke et al. 1998; Bártol et al. 2002; Hauber et al. 2006; Stokke et al. 2007, 2008).”