Trade-offs in phenotypic traits: endurance at birth, growth, survival, predation and susceptibility to parasitism in a lizard, Lacerta vivipara.
By J. Clobert, A. Oppliger, G. Sorci, Bruno Ernande, J. Swallow, Theodore Garland Jr.. 2000
152 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Parasitology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c08672eb48d697cd27280c14bf6b47ffc118e1d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Global and Planetary Change
In Parasitology
Citations in the corpus
- Personality and the pace‐of‐life syndrome: variation and selection on exploration, metabolism and locomotor performances (2013, background): “growth and juvenile survival within and between populations of the common lizard pointed out to the existence of a growth-survival trade-off (Sorci, Clobert & Bélichon 1996; Clobert et al. 2000; Mugabo et al. 2010).”
- Relating endocrinology, physiology and behaviour using species with alternative mating strategies (2007, unknown): “Clobert et al .”
- Determining the fitness consequences of antipredation behavior (2005, background): “Similarly, locomotor endurance in juvenile common lizards Lacerta vivipara seems to be connected to growth rate and hence incur an increased predation risk, as measured by reduced survival (Clobert et al., 2000; see also Le Galliard et al., 2004).”
- How does selection operate on whole-organism functional performance capacities? A review and synthesis (2008, background): “Clobert et al. (2000) found no evidence for selection on endurance capacity in hatchling common lizards (Lacerta vivipara) that were measured directly after birth and released into nature, although later analyses (Le Galliard and Ferrière, 2008) showed some evidence for directional selection…”
- The righting response as a fitness index in freshwater turtles (2007, background): “For lizards and snakes, the most commonly studied performances include running or swimming speed (snakes: Burger, 1989; lizards: Garland, Hankins & Huey, 1990; Huey et al ., 1990; Elphick & Shine, 1998, 1999; Irschick & Losos, 1998; Clobert et al ., 2000; Webb, Brown & 100 V. DELMAS ET AL .”
- The evolution of thermal physiology in endotherms. (2002, background): “The obvious benefits of enhanced locomotor performance may be balanced by less obvious costs resulting from trade-offs between locomotor performance and other aspects of the phenotype (Clobert et al., 2000).”
- Locomotor performance and social dominance in male Anolis cristatellus (2004, background): “Locomotor performance, the focus of the current study, can directly affect foraging abilities, predator avoidance and reproductive success (references in Garland & Losos 1994; Clobert et al. 2000; Irschick & Garland 2001).”
- Integrating function and ecology in studies of adaptation: Investigations of locomotor capacity as a model system (2001, background): “Overall, the available data seem to support the notion that performance-limited lizard species or ontogenetic classes compensate by using a greater fraction of their performance capacities in nature (see also Clobert et al. 2000), but the hypothesis does not explain all the observed variation.”
- Differences in morphology, performance and behaviour between recently diverged populations of Podarcis sicula mirror differences in predation pressure (2007, methodology): “Although the direct evidence for a survival value of endurance capacity is mixed (Le Galliard et al. 2004, but see Clobert et al. 2000), it seems logical to assume that good exertion abilities would benefit lizards that are being chased in relatively open habitats.”