Improved Algorithms for Linear Stochastic Bandits
By Yasin Abbasi-Yadkori, Dávid Pál, Csaba Szepesvari. 2011
2,065 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Reinforcement Learning
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Reinforcement Learning
- Sergey Levine
- Emma Brunskill
- Lihong Li
- Nan Jiang
- Csaba Szepesvari
- R´emi Munos
- Alekh Agarwal
- Ian Osband
Citations in the corpus
- On the Complexity of Bandit and Derivative-Free Stochastic Convex Optimization (2012, background): “Keywords: Stochastic Convex Optimization; Derivative-Free Optimization; Bandit Convex Optimization; Regret”
- Dueling RL: Reinforcement Learning with Trajectory Preferences (2021, background): “10 of Abbasi-Yadkori et al. (2011) in the final step of the proof of Lem.”
- Surprising Negative Results for Generative Adversarial Tree Search (2018, background): “Bias-Variance Trade-Off: Consider an MDP M = 〈X ,A, T, R, γ〉, with state space X , action space A, transition kernel T , reward distribution R with [0, 1]-bounded mean, and discount factor 0 ≤ γ < 1.”
- Balanced Linear Contextual Bandits (2018, background): “In general, UCB based algorithms ((Auer 2003; Chu et al. 2011; Bubeck and Cesa-Bianchi 2012; Abbasi-Yadkori, P´al, and Szepesv´ari 2011)) tend to have better (and sometimes near-optimal) theoretical regret bounds.”
- Estimation Considerations in Contextual Bandits (2017, background): “In general, UCB based algorithms ([11, 23, 21, 1]) tend to have better (and sometimes near-optimal) theoretical regret bounds.”
- Regret Analysis of Stochastic and Nonstochastic Multi-armed Bandit Problems (2012, neutral): “More complex algorithms for various extensions of the stochastic multi-armed bandit problem are also based on the same idea which, along with the exponential weighting scheme presented in Section 3, is an algorithmic cornerstone of regret analysis in bandits.”
- Learning to Optimize via Posterior Sampling (2013, methodology): “[2] and [3], which apply to linear models, the analysis of Filippi et al.”
- Fair Algorithms for Infinite and Contextual Bandits (2016, methodology): “The top of page 15 of of [Abbasi-Yadkori et al., 2011] notes that log det(V̄t) ≤ d log(γ + t/d), and we combine this with the fact that ∑T t=1 ||xt,i||2V̄t ≤ 2 log det(V̄ T )− 2 log det(V ) (proven as part of Lemma 11 in [Abbasi-Yadkori et al.”
- Parallelizing Exploration-Exploitation Tradeoffs with Gaussian Process Bandit Optimization (2012, methodology): “Various methods of introducing dependence include bandits with linear (Dani et al., 2008; Abernethy et al., 2008; Abbasi-Yadkori et al., 2011) or Lipschitzcontinuous payoffs (Kleinberg et al.”
- Efficient Exploration Through Bayesian Deep Q-Networks (2018, methodology): “The main body of the following analyses on concentration of measure are based on the contextual linear bandit analyses (Abbasi-Yadkori et al., 2011; Chu et al., 2011; Li et al., 2010; Rusmevichientong & Tsitsiklis, 2010; Dani et al., 2008; Russo & Van Roy, 2014a) and self normalized processes (de…”
- A Tutorial on Thompson Sampling (2017, positive): “It follows from the above relation that existing analyses (Dani et al., 2008; Rusmevichientong and Tsitsiklis, 2010; Abbasi-Yadkori et al., 2011) of UCB algorithms imply that under TS”
- Thompson Sampling for Contextual Bandits with Linear Payoffs (2012, methodology): “Abbasi-Yadkori et al. (2011) analyze a UCB-style algorithm and provide a regret upper bound of O(d log (T ) √ T+ √ dT log (T/δ)).”
- Provable Optimal Algorithms for Generalized Linear Contextual Bandits (2017, methodology): “We instead use results on self-normalized martingales (Abbasi-Yadkori et al., 2011), together with a finitetime normality result like Theorem 1, to prove the next theorem.”
- Online Decision Making with High-Dimensional Covariates (2020, methodology): “We evaluate the LASSO Bandit on a synthetically-generated dataset to address two questions: (1) How does the LASSO Bandit’s performance compare against existing algorithms empirically?; (2) Is the LASSO Bandit robust to the choice of input parameters? We compare the LASSO Bandit against (i) the UCB-”
- Offline Multi-Action Policy Learning: Generalization and Optimization (2018, background): “(2011), Abbasi-Yadkori et al. (2011), Bubeck et al. (2012), Agrawal and Goyal (2013), Russo and Van Roy (2014), Bastani and Bayati (2015), Li et al.”
- Online Clustering of Bandits (2014, methodology): “From (Abbasi-Yadkori et al., 2011) it follows that |u>i x−w>i,tx| ≤ TCBi,t(x) holds with probability at least 1− δ/2, uniformly over i ∈ V , t = 0, 1, 2, . . .. and x ∈ Rd.”
- Exploiting the Natural Exploration In Contextual Bandits (2017, methodology): “Greedy-First can switch to any contextual bandit algorithm (e.g., OFUL by [AYPS11] or Thompson sampling by [AG13, RVR14a]) instead of the OLS Bandit.”
- Model-based Reinforcement Learning and the Eluder Dimension (2014, background): “Papers here establigh regret bounds Õ( Ô T ) for linear quadratic control [16], but with constants that grow exponentially with dimension.”