Innovation in low- and medium-technology industries

By P. Robertson, Keith Smith, Nick von Tunzelmann. 2009

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The role of low- and medium-technology (LMT) firms and industries in modern economies is complex and frequently misunderstood. Significantly, the title of Hatzichronoglou's (1997) widely used revision of the OECD classification of sectors and products refers explicitly only to high technology. By implication, the remainder of the economy is known by what it is not (high technology) and what it does not do (spend more than five percent of revenues on research and development). Arguably, this has contributed to an unfortunate tendency to understate the importance of technological change outside such R&D-intensive fields as information and communications technology (ICT) and biotechnology (Hirsch-Kreinsen et al., 2006 H. Hirsch-Kreinsen, D. Jacobson and P.L. Robertson, ‘Low-tech’ industries: innovativeness and development perspectives—a summary of a European research project, Prometheus 24 (2006), pp. 3–21. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (7)Hirsch-Kreinsen et al., 2006). Although their products and production processes may be highly complex and capital intensive, LMT enterprises are often regarded as being somewhat old-fashioned or even passe. In comparison to high-tech industries, their markets are generally mature and may be slow-growing and subject to over-capacity and high levels of price competition. During the globalisation movement of the past few decades, some LMT activities have been prime candidates for relocation from highly industrialised to newly industrialising economies. When they manage to survive in older economies, LMT sectors acquire unfortunate tags such as ‘rust belt’.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6be5e7ec5f97d974a6fe7ab7e87f3446971ac1a4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Juergen Janger
  2. Petra Andries
  3. Torben Schubert
  4. C. Rammer
  5. Machteld Hoskens
  6. C. Ghisetti

In Strategy and Management

  1. Torben Schubert
  2. Juergen Janger
  3. Petra Andries
  4. C. Rammer
  5. C. Ghisetti

Citations in the corpus