The technological origins of radical inventions

By Wwme Schoenmakers, Geert Duysters. 2010

358 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6be41e1cbef544d60ad59ebd0c4f3457ab46ee8c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

The Geography of Complex Knowledge (2017, background): “In related research, Schoenmakers and Duysters (2010) trace the technological origins of blockbuster patents to the number of knowledge domains they combine.”
Knowledge Spillovers from Renewable energy Technologies, Lessons from patent citations (2017, background): “14 Schoenmakers and Duysters (2010) also assume that a high number of forward citations reflect the technological importance of the invention for future technological advances and use it as a criterion for identifying radical patents from non-radical ones.”
Knowledge sources and impacts on subsequent inventions: Do green technologies differ from non-green ones? (2018, background): “The characterization of an invention, from an ex-post perspective, is related to the capacity to trigger future technological developments and open up a range of new technological opportunities (Schoenmakers and Duysters, 2010).”
Relatedness, external linkages and regional innovation in Europe (2018, neutral): “Patent citations directly point to the prior knowledge to which the current innovations draw upon, and therefore represent a good proxy for cross-regional linkages and knowledge flows (Jaffe and Trajtenberg, 1999; Schoenmakers and Duysters, 2010).”
Intellectual capital and radical innovation: Exploring the quadratic effects in technology-based manufacturing firms (2016, background): “Second, going beyond the technological knowledge base (Schoenmakers and Duysters, 2010), the authors delimit and identify the specific role played by each type of intellectual capital in its relationship with radical innovation.”
Do Important Inventions Benefit from Knowledge Originating in Other Technological Domains (2012, background): “It is negative, which is consistent with the notion that knowledge depreciates, so older prior art is less valuable than more recent art, as also found in Schoenmakers and Duysters (2010).”
Motivation and Ability? A Behavioral Perspective on the Pursuit of Radical Invention in Multi-Technology Incumbents (2017, neutral): “We test these arguments in the population of U.S. patents granted to for-profit firms between 1980 and 1997, using a measure of the ex ante novelty of a patent’s citations to assess its potential radicalness (Dahlin & Behrens, 2005; Schoenmakers & Duysters, 2010).”
A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological Change (2017, neutral): “Fo r p er so na l u se o nl y, a ll rig ht s r es er ve d. Schoenmakers and Duysters 2010).”