Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation.

By Kevin D. Shockley, Marie-Vee Santana, Carol A. Fowler. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2003

664 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Food Science, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6bd6e8e072499782ca1fb0bfbe019ea3dc8d6498

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Rick Dale
2. Michael J. Richardson
3. Kerry L. Marsh
4. Martin J. Pickering
5. Richard C. Schmidt
6. Ian Cross
7. T. Chartrand
8. Jessica L. Lakin

In Food Science

1. Michael J. Richardson
2. Kerry L. Marsh
3. Richard C. Schmidt
4. Rick Dale
5. Ian Cross
6. Martin J. Pickering

In Social Psychology

1. Michael J. Richardson
2. Kerry L. Marsh
3. Richard C. Schmidt
4. T. Chartrand
5. Günther Knoblich
6. Jessica L. Lakin
7. Rick Dale
8. Natalie Sebanz

Citations in the corpus

• Measuring the Dynamics of Interactional Synchrony (2012, neutral): “…to another’s rhythmic movement occurs spontaneously without conscious awareness (Miles et al. 2010; Oullier et al. 2008; Richardson et al. 2005; Schmidt and O’Brien 1997; Shockley et al. 2003; van Ulzen et al. 2008) and is nearly impossible to prevent from occurring (Issartel et al. 2007).”
• Alignment in second language dialogue (2008, background): “Non-linguistic aspects of behaviour can also become entrained, as for example when interlocutors come to mimic each other's posture (Shockley, Santana, & Fowler, 2003 ) or body movements (Chartrand & Bargh, 1999 ).”
• Converging toward a common speech code: imitative and perceptuo-motor recalibration processes in speech production (2013, neutral): “Convergence effects have been shown to be systematic and recurrent, and manifest themselves under many different forms, including posture (Shockley et al., 2003), head movements and facial expressions (Estow et al., 2007; Sato and Yoshikawa, 2007) and, regarding speech, vocal intensity (Natale,…”
• Naturalizing joint action: A process-based approach (2012, background): “Shockley et al. (2003) have shown that body posture aligns during naturalistic conversation, potentially generated by subtle matching of verbal cues (Shockley, Baker, Richardson, & Fowler, 2007), which also align during interaction (Giles, Coupland, & Coupland, 1991; see also Chartrand & Bargh,…”
• Why is conversation so easy? (2004, background): “been demonstrated that conversational partners dynamically align their posture [ 42 ].”
• Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. (2006, background): “observed for postural sway [ 64 ], and the swinging of hand-held pendulums [65,66] by pairs of participants while engaged in verbal problem solving tasks.”
• Dynamics of Interpersonal Coordination (2008, background): “[83] investigated whether conversation is sufficient to entrain the postural sway of two interacting participants.”
• Contrasting Approaches to Perceiving and Acting With Others (2006, methodology): “, & Strogatz, S. H. (1999). Time delay in the Kuramoto model of coupled oscillators. Physical Review Letters, 82, 648–651. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.”
• The evolutionary nature of musical meaning (2009, background): “…musical behaviours but a wide range of human communicative acts; recent work has shown that entrainment may be implicated in a wide range of communicative situations and be manifested in a variety of forms, from eye movements (Richardson et al., 2006) to postural changes (Shockley et al., 2003).”