Biological Limits of Gender Construction

By J. Udry. American Sociological Review, 2000

252 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A biosocial theory of gender is constructed on both the macro and micro levels. A micro-model of within-sex differences among females integrates the biological model current in primatology with the prevailing social science model. It shows how sex differences in hormone experience from gestation to adulthood shape gendered behavior (that is, behavior that differs by sex). On the macro level, this model also illustrates how socialization and environment shape gendered behavior. It then demonstrates how hormone experiences can facilitate or dampen the effects of socialization and environment on gendered behavior. Data are from a sample of women who were studied from before they were born to the end of their third decade. I speculate about the constraints placed by biology on the social reconstruction of gender.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Gender Studies, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6bccf940f666df8d8be654c13637618852b64844

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. D. Schmitt
  2. Eric P. Stenstrom
  3. R. Stark
  4. R. Jordan-Young
  5. Kingsley R. Browne
  6. N. Sarkisian
  7. Elizabeth Hampson
  8. Gad Saad

In Gender Studies

  1. N. Gerstel
  2. N. Sarkisian
  3. R. Stark
  4. R. Jordan-Young
  5. Kingsley R. Browne
  6. Elizabeth Hampson
  7. Raffaella Ida Rumiati
  8. Stewart Thornhill

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

  1. R. Stark
  2. R. Jordan-Young
  3. Kingsley R. Browne
  4. N. Sarkisian
  5. Elizabeth Hampson
  6. Raffaella Ida Rumiati
  7. Stewart Thornhill
  8. N. Gerstel

Citations in the corpus