Function Optimization using Connectionist Reinforcement Learning Algorithms
By Ronald J. Williams, Jing Peng. 1991
Subfields: Reinforcement Learning
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Reinforcement Learning
- Sergey Levine
- Pieter Abbeel
- Ofir Nachum
- Chelsea Finn
- Shimon Whiteson
- Yuxi Li
- Shixiang Shane Gu
- George Tucker
Citations in the corpus
- Reinforcement Learning and Control as Probabilistic Inference: Tutorial and Review (2018, methodology): “This technique was proposed as early as the first work on the REINFORCE algorithm (Williams and Peng, 1991; Williams, 1992), and is often used in recent methods (see, e.g., discussion by O’Donoghue et al. (2017)).”
- Bridging the Gap Between Value and Policy Based Reinforcement Learning (2017, methodology): “The key idea of including a maximum entropy regularizer to encourage exploration is common in RL (Williams & Peng, 1991; Mnih et al., 2016) and inverse RL (Ziebart et al., 2008).”
- Towards Better Decoding and Language Model Integration in Sequence to Sequence Models (2016, methodology): “Smoothing techniques increase the entropy of a model’s predictions, a technique that was used to promote exploration in reinforcement learning [27, 28, 29].”
- Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributions (2017, methodology): “In reinforcement learning, encouraging the policy to have an output distribution with high entropy has been used to improve exploration (Williams & Peng, 1991).”
- Algorithmic Framework for Model-based Deep Reinforcement Learning with Theoretical Guarantees (2018, methodology): “Entropy regularization: An additional component we apply to SLBO is the commonly-adopted entropy regularization in policy gradient method (Williams & Peng, 1991; Mnih et al., 2016), which was found to significantly boost the performance in our experiments (ablation study in Appendix F.5).”
- Variational Bayesian Reinforcement Learning with Regret Bounds (2018, background): “These approaches are very closely related to maximum entropy reinforcement learning techniques which add an entropy regularization ‘bonus’ to prevent early convergence to deterministic policies and thereby heuristically encourage exploration [57, 59, 28, 35, 2, 25].”
- Continuous Doubly Constrained Batch Reinforcement Learning (2021, methodology): “Standard regularization techniques are leveraged in supervised learning to address such ill-specified estimation problems, and have been employed in the RL setting as well [12, 50, 62].”
- Image Augmentation Is All You Need: Regularizing Deep Reinforcement Learning from Pixels (2020, background): “Another approach is entropy regularization [51, 20, 38, 47], where causal entropy is added to the rewards, making the Q-function smoother and facilitating optimization [2].”
- DeepMind Control Suite (2018, methodology): “Due to the different parallelization architectures, the evaluation protocol for each agent was slightly different: DDPG was evaluated for 10 episodes for every 100000 steps (with no exploration noise), and A3C was trained with 32 workers and concurrently evaluated with another worker that updated its ”
- Reward Augmented Maximum Likelihood for Neural Structured Prediction (2016, background): “By contrast, reinforcement learning (RL) advocates optimizing expected reward (with a maximum entropy regularizer [38]), which is formulated as minimization of the following objective,”
- Ask the Right Questions: Active Question Reformulation with Reinforcement Learning (2017, methodology): “To compute gradients for training with use the REINFORCE method [Williams and Peng, 1991],”
- Mapping Instructions and Visual Observations to Actions with Reinforcement Learning (2017, methodology): “To delay premature convergence we add an entropy term to the objective (Williams and Peng, 1991; Mnih et al., 2016).”
- Language GANs Falling Short (2018, background): “…discriminator (Guo et al., 2017), step-level loss instead of sequence level (Fedus et al., 2018), learned baseline to reduce variance (Fedus et al., 2018), regularizing REINFORCE with a maximum-entropy loss (Williams & Peng, 1991) and alternating adversarial loss with MLE loss (Guo et al., 2017).”
- Metacontrol for Adaptive Imagination-Based Optimization (2017, methodology): “To discourage the manager from learning what is an essentially deterministic policy, we included a regularization term based on the entropy, L H (Williams & Peng, 1991; Mnih et al., 2016): r is the full return given by (3) and λ is the strength of the regularization term.”
- TOUCHDOWN: Natural Language Navigation and Spatial Reasoning in Visual Street Environments (2018, background): “The reward shaping term is F ( s, a, s (cid:48) ) = φ ( s (cid:48) ) − φ ( s ) , where the potential function φ ( s ) is the length of the shortest path from agent position at the state s to the goal state.”