Analysis, Interpretation, and Visual Presentation of Experimental Data

By G. Loftus. 2002

63 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Food Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6bbe895ac46b39b9c57e18a350e766ea8cc8f75f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

1. S. Finch
2. Geoff Cumming
3. M. Masson
4. Reinhold Kliegl
5. Garrison W. Cottrell
6. Julie A. Van Dyke
7. Roger Levy
8. Richard Futrell

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. M. Masson
2. Eike
3. M. Richter
4. Reinhold Kliegl
5. S. Finch
6. Geoff Cumming
7. Garrison W. Cottrell
8. Keith Rayner

In Food Science

1. S. Finch
2. Geoff Cumming
3. M. Masson
4. Reinhold Kliegl
5. Julie A. Van Dyke
6. Roger Levy
7. Richard Futrell
8. Ethan Gotlieb Wilcox

Citations in the corpus

• Visual attention and temporal discrimination: Differential effects of automatic and voluntary cueing (2006, background): “pooled error terms of the corresponding ANOVA (Loftus, 2002).”
• A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming (2010, background): “Matters are not straightforward, however, for their influence on interactions (e.g., Loftus, 2002).”
• A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values (2007, unknown): “…(see, e.g., Cohen, 1994; Cortina & Dunlap, 1997; Cum-ming, 2007; Dixon, 2003; Frick, 1996; Gigerenzer, 1993, 1998; Hagen, 1997; Killeen, 2005a, 2006; M. D. Lee & Wagenmakers, 2005; Loftus, 1996, 2002; Nickerson, 2000; Schmidt, 1996; Trafimow, 2003; Wagenmakers & Grünwald, 2006; Wainer, 1999).”
• Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. (2003, methodology): “ Loftus (2002) presented further examples of contrast effects that can be used to make full use of graphical displays of data from factorial designs.”
• Evidence and a Computational Explanation of Cultural Differences in Facial Expression Recognition (2010, background): “The confidence intervals are for the cell means and include the between-subjects variance (Loftus, 2002).”
• Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. (2005, background): “The problem of how the CIs needed for effects involving within-subjects IVs can be represented in figures has been discussed by Estes (1997), Loftus (2002), Loftus and Masson (1994), and Masson and Loftus (2003).”