Measuring and Analyzing Cross-country Differences in Firm Dynamics

By Eric Bartelsman, John C. Haltiwanger, S. Scarpetta. 2009

298 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6bb153710f78ae4925d476620e374b7ff5e764d9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. John C. Haltiwanger
2. S. Scarpetta
3. John P. Martin
4. Eric Bartelsman
5. Levon Barseghyan
6. Chiara Criscuolo
7. C. Menon
8. Giuseppe Berlingieri

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Chiara Criscuolo
2. S. Scarpetta
3. John C. Haltiwanger
4. John P. Martin
5. Eric Bartelsman
6. C. Menon
7. Toshihiko Mukoyama
8. Giuseppe Berlingieri

Citations in the corpus

• What Drives the Dynamics of Business Growth (2016, background): “Recent evidence demonstrates the importance of firm dynamics and resource reallocation for the processes of creative destruction, selection and learning, and their impact on aggregate employment and productivity growth (OECD, 2009b, Bartelsman et al., 2009a and Bravo-Biosca, 2010b).”
• Firms and the Decline in Earnings Inequality in Brazil (2017, unknown): “Our productivity measure differs from commonly used total factor productivity (Bartelsman et al., 2009, 2013) since it does not control for capital intensity.”
• Setting It Right: Employment Protection, Labour Reallocation and Productivity (2011, methodology): “…goods or services which benefits from a certain degree of autonomy in decision-making, especially for the allocation of its current resources” (see Bartelsman et al. 2009). obtained from individual micro-data available in national Labour Force Surveys.6 As the industry-level information of…”
• The Scandinavian model—An interpretation (2014, unknown): “See also Bartelsman et al. (2009).”
• Cross-Country Differences in Productivity: The Role of Allocation and Selection (2013, methodology): “A detailed technical description of the dataset and the measures of outputs, inputs, deflators and productivity measures can be found in Bartelsman, Haltiwanger, and Scarpetta (2009) but we provide a brief overview here.”
• Explaining Enterprise Performance in Developing Countries with Business Climate Survey Data (2008, unknown): “Many papers include measures of competition in their business climate regressions, including Bastos and Nasir (2004), Escribano and Guasch (2005), Beck, Demirgüç-Kunt, and Maksimovic (2005), Hallward-Driemeier, Wallsten, and Xu (2006) and Commander and Svejnar (2007).”
• Industry Concentration in Europe and North America (2019, methodology): “This methodology was pioneered in the early 2000s in a series of cross-country projects on firm demographics and productivity (Bartelsman et al., 2005; Bartelsman et al., 2009).”
• THE INNOVATION†EMPLOYMENT NEXUS: A CRITICAL SURVEY OF THEORY AND EMPIRICS (2016, unknown): “Exploring a more recent dataset with the aim of measuring cross-country differences in productivity growth, Bartelsman et al. (2009) confirm the negative sign of the interaction effect.”
• Cross Country Differences in Job Reallocation: The Role of Industry, Firm Size and Regulations (2014, unknown): “However, the empirical evidence on the impact of labor regulations on job flows is inconclusive — countries with different types of labor regulations are observed to have fairly similar gross job flows (see, e.g., Bartelsman et al., 2009; Bertola and Rogerson, 1997; Boeri, 1999).”
• Productivity growth in Italy: a tale of a slow-motion change (2018, unknown): “A reduction in PMR indices, as a consequence of reforms aimed at liberalizing market services and easing regulation and bureaucratic constrains, is meant to reduce monopolistic rents also favoring competition and entrants of new firms (OECD, 2009; Bartelsman et al., 2009; Bravo-Biosca et al. 2013).”
• Non Performing Loans, Prospective Bailouts, and Japan's Slowdown (2010, background): “Basu’s (1996) preferred estimate of overhead inputs is 28%.”
• Institutional Barriers and Industry Dynamics (2014, background): “Recent work has begun to employ comparative studies to understand the impact of institutional environments but recognizes that unobserved country-level heterogeneity and incomparable data make crosscountry comparisons difficult (Bartelsman et al ., 2009; Brown and Earle, 2008).”
• Job Creation and Firm Dynamics in the United States (2012, background): “Bartelsman et al. (2009a, 2009b) also show that these differences in the size and productivity covariances are potentially quite important in accounting for differences in output per capita across countries.”
• Evaluating the effects of entry regulations and firing costs on international income differences (2012, background): “Because L is an endogenous variable, this is done by first finding an M that satisfies (6) with L = 0.”