The impact of free-roaming dogs on gazelle kid/female ratio in a fragmented area

By R. Manor, David Saltz. 2004

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b1d1c970187da1a29a68a63369a834a4784b3f0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Genetics

In Small Animals

Citations in the corpus

Dogs Canis familiaris as carnivores: their role and function in intraguild competition (2009, background): “For example, dogs are one of the main contributors to a declining kid-to-female ratio in mountain gazelles Gazella gazella in Israel (Manor & Saltz, 2004).”
Dietary Niche Separation Between Sympatric Free-Ranging Domestic Dogs and Indian Foxes in Central India (2009, background): “…of Mammalogists www.mammalogy.org 1058 Although dogs are known to kill and feed on wildlife, much of the information on the diet of dogs has come from anecdotal reports or from studies focused on specific wild prey species (Lowry and McArthur 1978; Manor and Saltz 2004; Yanes and Suárez 1996).”
Domestic dogs as an edge effect in the Brasília National Park, Brazil: interactions with native mammals (2009, background): “One consequence of fragmentation is the increased proximity of domestic dogs Canis familiaris to human-dominated areas, resulting in an influx toward the remaining original habitats (Oehler & Litvatis, 1996; Butler & du Toit, 2002; Manor & Saltz, 2004; Galetti & Sazima, 2006).”
Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia (2012, background): “They areflexible in their hunting and foraging tactics, being hypercarnivorous, mesocarnivorous (meat 50–70%of diet:VanValkenburgh 1988), hypocarnivorous (meat <30% of diet: Van Valkenburgh 1988) and saprophagous (scavenging on dead material) according to opportunity or need (Fiennes and Fiennes 196”
Conservation and ecological implications of the use of space by chilla foxes and free-ranging dogs in a human-dominated landscape in southern Chile (2010, background): “Free-ranging dogs negatively affect wildlife through depredation (Iverson 1978; Taborsky 1988; Manor & Saltz 2004; Campos et al. 2007; Silva-Rodríguez et al. 2009b), fear-related alteration of activity patterns (Miller et al. 2001; Banks & Bryant 2007), exploitation competition (Butler & Toit 2002;…”
Predation of wildlife by free-ranging domestic dogs in Polish hunting grounds and potential competition with the grey wolf (2016, background): “However, dogs are social canids that can temporarily form packs consisting of 2–8 individuals (Causey and Cude, 1980; Galetti and Sazima, 2006; Manor and Saltz, 2004; Vanak and Gompper, 2010).”
The Wayward Dog: Is the Australian native dog or Dingo a distinct species? (2017, background): “Studies of feral dogs in Africa and India (e.g. Manor & Saltz 2004; Pal 2001, 2008) showed they have similar behaviours and social structures to free-ranging Dingoes in Australia.”
Domestic dogs shape the landscape-scale distribution of a threatened forest ungulate (2012, background): “, 2009), which could lead to reduced reproductive success (Gingold et al., 2009; Manor and Saltz, 2004; Sheriff et al., 2009).”
The ecological effects of providing resource subsidies to predators (2015, background): “An influx of free-roaming dogs in human-dominated landscapes in Israel was also the major factor causing decreased recruitment of mountain gazelle (Gazella gazella gazella) (Manor & Saltz, 2004).”