Domestic dogs as an edge effect in the Brasília National Park, Brazil: interactions with native mammals

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Altered activity patterns and reduced abundance of native mammals in sites with feral dogs in the high Andes (2016, background): “has been reported as a serious threat to wildlife in numerous parts of the world (Lacerda et al. 2009; Silva-Rodríguez et al. 2010; Vanak and Gompper 2009) and likely is important in the Tropical Andes.”
Differential responses of large mammals to logging and edge effects (2015, background): “In general, while dge effects are known to be among the strongest factors affecting icroclimates and tree communities in tropical forests (Laurance t al., 2011; Santos et al., 2010), we have a poorer understanding f their impacts on large vertebrates (Lacerda et al., 2009; Norris t al., 2008).”
Domestic dogs shape the landscape-scale distribution of a threatened forest ungulate (2012, background): “, 2009) and interference competition (Lacerda et al., 2009; Silva-Rodriguez et al., 2010a; Vanak and Gompper, 2010) are the results of dogs wandering into wildlife habitat.”
Forest loss or management intensification? Identifying causes of mammal decline in cacao agroforests (2014, background): “Domestic dogs, which are more frequent in forest edges than in interiors, in the matrix than in forest remnants, and near human settlement (Lacerda and Tomas, 2009; Vanak and Gompper, 2010), are considered weak competitors (Vanak and Gompper, 2009).”