Wild Bootstrap Inference for Wildly Different Cluster Sizes

By James G. MacKinnon, Matthew D. Webb. 2013

411 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Summary The cluster robust variance estimator (CRVE) relies on the number of clusters being sufficiently large. Monte Carlo evidence suggests that the ‘rule of 42’ is not true for unbalanced clusters. Rejection frequencies are higher for datasets with 50 clusters proportional to US state populations than with 50 balanced clusters. Using critical values based on the wild cluster bootstrap performs much better. However, this procedure fails when a small number of clusters is treated. We explain why CRVE t statistics and the wild bootstrap fail in this case, study the ‘effective number’ of clusters and simulate placebo laws with dummy variable regressors. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6afd06af6b2f4ab964783cec39d587cc00f4be8e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. James Pustejovsky
  2. Morten Ørregaard Nielsen
  3. Elizabeth Tipton
  4. James G. MacKinnon
  5. Matthew D. Webb
  6. Ivan A. Canay
  7. Andrés Santos
  8. Hristos Doucouliagos

In Statistics and Probability

  1. James Pustejovsky
  2. Morten Ørregaard Nielsen
  3. James G. MacKinnon
  4. Matthew D. Webb
  5. Elizabeth Tipton
  6. Ivan A. Canay
  7. Andrés Santos
  8. A. Shaikh

Citations in the corpus