The Case for Cross-Disciplinary Approaches in International Development

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in Poverty Analysis (2002, unknown): “One of the ‘‘oppositions’’ between economics and other social sciences is that between quantitative and qualitative approaches ( Harriss, 2002 ).”
Culture and Public Action (2004, background): “…to development; and Woolcock and Narayan (2000) for a discussion of the potential role of social capital in economic development from the World Bank’s perspective; Harriss (2001) for a stringent critique of the World Bank’s use of the concept; and Bebbington et al. (in press) for a defense.”
Painting the floor with a hammer: Technical fixes in fisheries management (2006, background): “Although recognizing disciplines are productive as they generate the conditions for accumulation of knowledge and deepening our understanding of the natural and social world, Harriss (2002:488) [7] argues that disciplines also impose constraints that are repressive rather than productive: Academic d”