Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in Poverty Analysis
By H. White. 2002
256 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Development, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7e52ad265aa4ff2be2513f33148f056c1e65142
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Development
- F. Ellis
- J. Upton
- J. Holland
- Kate Ghezzi-Kopel
- H. Freeman
- John Hoddinott
- Christopher B. Barrett
- E. Allison
In Safety Research
- Christopher B. Barrett
- J. Holland
- J. Upton
- Kate Ghezzi-Kopel
- F. Ellis
- H. Freeman
- John Hoddinott
- E. Allison
In Sociology and Political Science
- Christopher B. Barrett
- John Hoddinott
- J. Upton
- Kate Ghezzi-Kopel
- Tong Wu
- N. Homami
- E. Tennant
- J. Holland
Citations in the corpus
- Migration and technical efficiency in cereal production: evidence from Burkina Faso: F. Wouterse / Agricultural Economics xx (2010) 1-11 (2010, unknown): “16 requirements of successful households (White, 2002).”
- Rural livelihoods and poverty reduction policies. (2005, unknown): “This mixture of qualitative and quantitative data collection has gained credence in the literature on development research methods (Kanbur 2001; White 2002), with qualitative methods seen as more effective in understanding social contexts, while quantitative methods are required in order to make sta”
- Triangulation and integration: processes, claims and implications (2006, background): “Indeed, multiple approaches are now considered to be essential underpinnings to whole programmes of research for some social problems (Mazur and Parry, 1998; Oakley, 1998; White, 2002).”
- A scoping review of the development resilience literature: Theory, methods and evidence (2021, methodology): “Mixed methods research holds particular promise for development resilience research, much as has been done quite fruitfully in poverty research (White 2002, Kanbur 2003, Barrett et al. 2006, Howe and McKay 2007, Davis and Baulch 2011, Shaffer 2013).”
- Livelihoods and Rural Poverty Reduction in Kenya (2004, methodology): “However, a judicious mix of qualitative and quantitative methods can help to reduce Livelihoods and Rural Poverty Reduction in Kenya 153 these to a manageable level (Kanbur, 2001; White, 2002).”
- Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Impact Evaluation and Measuring Results (2009, methodology): “Qualitative analysis identifies knowledge gaps to be filled by survey (here White (2008) describes how crucial information was not collected before a quantitative baseline survey took place and consequently no information was collected on one key explanatory variable (see Box 4.”
- Reconsidering the links between poverty, international labour migration, and agrarian change: critical insights from Nepal (2016, methodology): “The research employed a mixed research strategy with the objective of creating ‘synergy’ between quantitative and qualitative techniques (White 2002).”
- Rural Livelihoods and Poverty Reduction Strategies in Four African Countries (2004, unknown): “This mixture of qualitative and quantitative data collection has been gaining credence in the literature on development research methods [ Booth et al., 1998; Kanbur, 2001; White, 2002 ].”
- Farmer willingness to pay for seed-related information: rice varieties in Nigeria and Benin (2007, background): “Polygamy is socially accepted and it also provides additional household labor (White, 2002).”