Hepatic insufficiency and mortality in 1,059 noncirrhotic patients undergoing major hepatectomy.
By J. Mullen, D. Ribero, S. Reddy, M. Donadon, D. Zorzi, S. Gautam, E. Abdalla, S. Curley, L. Capussotti, B. Clary and 1 more. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2007
617 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Hepatology, Surgery
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a8f7192b30896691a1aef65bce783e732ad8744
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- M. Rees
- J. Vauthey
- M. Nagino
- N. Rahbari
- M. Koch
- R. Adam
- S. Strasberg
- O. Garden
Citations in the corpus
- The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications: Five-Year Experience (2009, neutral): “The MD Anderson group applied the term minor for grades I and II complications, major for grades III and IV, and, separately, reported death (grade V complication).(35,36) Seven percent of the authors (n 4) made different choices; for example, considering minor complications as grades I to IIIa and ”
- Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). (2011, methodology): “These authors, however, did not report liver function tests for postoperative day 5 or relate these to the extent of resection at various time points during the postoperative period.77 Based on a more recent analysis of the normal course of liver function tests after hepatic resection, we chose post”
- The Accordion Severity Grading System of Surgical Complications (2009, background): “7%) even in those describing complex procedures with large numbers of complications.(85,95,99) In comparison grade 3a, 3b, 4a, and 5 complications made up a much larger percent of complications— 14.”