The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications: Five-Year Experience

By P. Clavien, J. Barkun, M. D. de Oliveira, J. Vauthey, D. Dindo, R. Schulick, E. de Santibañes, J. Pekolj, K. Slankamenac, C. Bassi and 5 more. Annals of Surgery, 2009

8,232 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Rheumatology, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6051fae82e47ba0ee9d978e4e956ef402a2a9737

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. H. Katayama
2. Y. Kurokawa
3. Muneeb Ahmed
4. Kenichi Nakamura
5. Hiroyuki Ito
6. Y. Kanemitsu
7. Luigi Solbiati
8. N. Masuda

Citations in the corpus

• Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria--a 10-year update. (2014, methodology): “0 of the National Cancer Institute and the Clavien-Dindo classification system are commonly used systems in oncologic and surgical practice (89, 90).”
• Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria (2015, methodology): “This refined Clavien-Dindo classification has been used increasingly in clinical practice and also in clinical trials involving surgical procedures, because it is simple, reproducible, and flexible [12].”