Mapping context and content: the BrainMap model

By Peter T. Fox, Jack L. Lancaster. 2002

510 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business (2010, methodology): “Neuromarketers have been quick to invert this finding and use ventral striatal activity as an indication that an individual likes something; but what is the evidence for this? Using Poldrack's method to analyse the BrainMap database, we estimated the posterior probability for a reward process given ”
Cognitive relevance of the community structure of the human brain functional coactivation network (2013, methodology): “The strength of functional coactivation was estimated by the Jaccard index (range [0,1]), a measure of similarity between the patterns of activation of two regions reported across a large number of experimental contrasts in the primary literature of 1,641 task-related fMRI or PET studies published b”
Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest (2009, methodology): “To this end, we have used BrainMap (15, 16), currently the largest database of FMRI and PET brain activation studies.”
The UCLA multimodal connectivity database: a web-based platform for brain connectivity matrix sharing and analysis (2012, background): “…data analyses and associated metadata including the number of subjects, the subject disease state (healthy or diseased), the applied analysis techniques, the experimental paradigm, and the cognitive process under investigation (e.g., working memory) (Fox and Lancaster, 2002; Laird et al., 2005).”
Investigating the Functional Heterogeneity of the Default Mode Network Using Coordinate-Based Meta-Analytic Modeling (2009, methodology): “Published task-independent deactivations were accessed using the BrainMap database (Fox and Lancaster, 2002; Laird et al., 2005c), which archives peak coordinates of activations and their corresponding metadata (e.g., number and diagnosis of subjects, analysis technique, paradigm, cognitive domain,…”
The hubs of the human connectome are generally implicated in the anatomy of brain disorders (2014, methodology): “We also searched the BrainMap database (Fox and Lancaster, 2002; Fox et al., 2005; Laird et al., 2005) and updated this open access database with the results of any additional primary studies identified by the PubMed searches, so that the complete set of primary coordinates used for the…”
Meta-analysis of 41 Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Executive Function in Schizophrenia (2009, methodology): “All data processing was performed in the BrainMap environment.(53,54) On insertion into the database, the spatial normalization template of each article was noted and the coordinates were automatically transformed to allow analysis relative to a single template.”
Modelling neural correlates of working memory: A coordinate-based meta-analysis (2011, unknown): “…using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) included in this meta-analysis were obtained from the BrainMap database (www.brainmap.org; (Fox and Lancaster, 2002; Laird et al., 2005) and a PubMed literature search (www.pubmed.org, search-strings: " fMRI, " [ " working memory " OR "…”
A meta-analysis of neurofunctional imaging studies of emotion and cognition in major depression (2012, unknown): “Studies not yet included in BrainMap were coded along with the corresponding design data via BrainMap Scribe (Version 1.2) (Fox and Lancaster, 2002; Laird et al., 2005b) and submitted for quality control and insertion into the BrainMap database (n = 22).”
Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions (2012, methodology): “A search of the BrainMap database (Fox & Lancaster, 2002; Laird, Fox, et al., 2005) was performed to identify all English-language, peer-reviewed studies that investigated executive function tasks in multiple healthy individuals, ages 18–60 years, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)…”
Ten simple rules for neuroimaging meta-analysis (2017, background): “org/) (Fox and Lancaster, 2002; Laird et al., 2005) or Neurosynth (http://neurosynth.”
Comparison of the disparity between Talairach and MNI coordinates in functional neuroimaging data: Validation of the Lancaster transform (2010, unknown): “The BrainMap database is an online archive of published neuroimaging results in the form of stereotactic coordinates (Fox and Lancaster, 2002; Laird et al., 2005a).”
Integrating evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychological studies of obsessive-compulsive disorder: the orbitofronto-striatal model revisited. (2008, methodology): “The studies were then inserted into a database in BrainMap (Fox and Lancaster, 2002; Laird et al., 2005b) for further analysis.”
Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analysis revisited (2011, methodology): “This property is illustrated by an assessment of the MA-maps resulting from more than 5500 experiments contained in the BrainMap database (www.brainmap.org; Fox and Lancaster, 2002; Laird et al., 2005).”