AVIAN COMMUNICATION IN URBAN NOISE: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF VOCAL ADJUSTMENT

By G. Patricelli, Jessica L. Blickley. 2006

443 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a75b30429aafad9071eb58fa1416173aa9fd286

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Citations in the corpus

A behavioural mechanism explaining noise-dependent frequency use in urban birdsong (2009, background): “It may concern genetic or ontogenetic change, immediate signalling flexibility, or a combination of these (Patricelli & Blickley 2006).”
A systematic review on the behavioural responses of wild marine mammals to noise: the disparity between science and policy (2016, background): “In a similar manner, changes in behaviour may also impose an energetic cost on individuals (see Patricelli and Blickley 2006).”
Differential responses of amphibians and reptiles in riparian and stream habitats to land use disturbances in western Georgia, USA (2008, background): “, 2006), noise (Patricelli and Blickley, 2006), and light pollution (Moore et al.”
High levels of environmental noise erode pair preferences in zebra finches: implications for noise pollution (2007, methodology): “Studies of other species suggest that males probably modulate their songs in response to increased amplitude noise (reviewed in Patricelli & Blickley 2006).”
Which birds adjust the frequency of vocalizations in urban noise (2010, background): “For these reasons, and since widespread urban noise is relatively recent in evolutionary time, it is thought that adjustments in urban oscine songs are a case of behavioural plasticity rather than genetic change (Patricelli & Blickley 2006).”
Understanding variation in behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change: a conceptual overview (2013, background): “To avoid interference from the background, animals should adjust their frequency to be different from their environment (Patricelli & Blickley 2006; Slabbekoorn & den Boer-Visser 2006; Parris et al. 2009; Potvin et al. 2011).”
Wind-induced noise alters signaler and receiver behavior in vibrational communication (2010, background): “…pattern of signaling is consistent with the noise-avoidance behavior seen in other taxa (Saxena and Kumar 1980; Greenfield 1988; Douglas and Conner 1999; Lengagne and Slater 2002; Sun and Narins 2005; Patricelli and Blickley 2006; Fuller et al. 2007) we have no evidence for a causal relationship.”
Noise pollution changes avian communities and species interactions. (2009, background): “edu To date, noise has been associated with declining bird densities [10–14], prompting conservation concerns that many species may be excluded from otherwise suitable habitat as a result of ecological sensitivities or intolerance to noise [1–4].”
Research, part of a Special Feature on Effects of Roads and Traffic on Wildlife Populations and Landscape Function Impacts of Traffic Noise and Traffic Volume on Birds of Roadside Habitats (2009, background): “…Research Centre for Urban Ecology, Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne, Australia, 3Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Australia roads must also compete with traffic noise, much of which occurs in the low-frequency bands below 2000 Hz (Patricelli and Blickley 2006, Warren et al. 2006).”