The Big Two in social judgment and behavior.

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Role of Agency and Morality in Reconciliation Processes (2015, background): “…along which people judge themselves and others at both individual and group levels: the agency dimension, representing traits such as strength, competence, and influence, and the moral-social dimension, representing traits such as morality, warmth, and trustworthiness (Abele & Wojciszke, 2013).”
The Social Psychology of Collective Victimhood (2017, background): “…review see Nadler & Shnabel, 2015) is that individuals and groups assess themselves and each other along two distinct identity dimensions, namely: the agency dimension subsuming traits such as influence and strength, and the moral dimension comprising morality and warmth (Abele & Wojciszke, 2013).”
Intergroup reconciliation: Instrumental and socio-emotional processes and the needs-based model (2015, background): “Nevertheless, theorising on the Big Two argues that these different contents can be subsumed under two overarching categories (see Abele & Wojciszke, 2013).”