The concept of relevance in IR
By Pia Borlund. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2003
559 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a353b97b202c9d5099a5465ce13464c7124181f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Diane Kelly
- Saleema Amershi
- Tefko Saracevic
- Mark Sanderson
- R. Caruana
- Lynda Tamine
- Todd Kulesza
- Mariam Daoud
In Information Systems
- Diane Kelly
- Tefko Saracevic
- Mohand Boughanem
- Mark Sanderson
- R. Caruana
- Lynda Tamine
- Mariam Daoud
- Donna K. Harman
Citations in the corpus
- Structured labeling for facilitating concept evolution in machine learning (2014, background): “While comparison-based judgments have been shown to be easier to make than absolute judgments, relevance judgments may still evolve as people observe data [7].”
- Evaluation of contextual information retrieval effectiveness: overview of issues and research (2010, background): “However, user oriented IR improved the understanding of the relevance concept [11,74] and promoted several other levels such as situational, affective and cognitive relevance.”
- Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance (2007, background): “Starting from the cognitive viewpoint and the idea that relevance judgments evolve during the process of IR interaction, Borlund (2003) developed a framework for viewing relevance that also can be considered a classification of various manifestations of relevance.”
- Test Collection Based Evaluation of Information Retrieval Systems (2010, methodology): “The involvement of users in evaluation of IR systems has long been advocated and conducted as is recorded and promoted in the works of Ingwersen and Järvelin [128], Saracevic [225], and Borlund [30, 31].”
- Methods for Evaluating Interactive Information Retrieval Systems with Users (2009, background): “In addition to these measures, Borlund [33] identifies several others that account for position of relevant documents including Cooper’s”