Field crop responses to ultraviolet-B radiation: a review

514 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Plant physiological responses to UV-B radiation - (2012, background): “…reduction can be the result of a changed allocation of biomass, increasing amounts of secondary compounds or morphological alterations which lead to lower photosynthetic productivity (Teramura et al. 1990; Fiscus and Booker, 1995; Caldwell et al., 2003; Kakani et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2005;).”
Machine learning regression algorithms for biophysical parameter retrieval: Opportunities for Sentinel-2 and -3 (2012, background): “…and involvement in many processes, Chl , FVC and LAI are crucial in aboveground biomass estimation, vegetative evapo-transpiration calculation and the energy-exchange evaluation of terrestrial vegetation (Baret & Guyot, 1991; Bicheron & Leroy, 1999; Buermann et al., 2001; Kakani et al., 2003).”
In the light of new greenhouse technologies: 1. Plant‐mediated effects of artificial lighting on arthropods and tritrophic interactions (2010, background): “Effects on plants’ primary and secondary metabolism have also been investigated (for a review, see Kakani et al., 2003).”
Impacts of Changing Climate and Climate Variability on Seed Production and Seed Industry (2013, background): “In regard to exposure to UV-B radiation, the majority of crop species (60%) show a reduction in dry matter production, a moderate 24% show no change, and only 8% of crop species show an increase in dry matter production (Kakani et al., 2003).”