In the light of new greenhouse technologies: 1. Plant‐mediated effects of artificial lighting on arthropods and tritrophic interactions
By Irene Vänninen, D. Pinto, A. Nissinen, N. S. Johansen, L. Shipp. 2010
106 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23329d2a87ceb77a8af5fd9eb59984bf8781c8e2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Is light pollution driving moth population declines? A review of causal mechanisms across the life cycle (2020, background): “Artificial light can alter the phenology of, or even suppress, flowering in some plants (Whitman et al., 1998; Chen et al., 2009; Vänninen et al., 2010; Bennie et al., 2018a).”
- The effects of light-emitting diode lighting on greenhouse plant growth and quality (2013, background): “It was proposed, that light color induced changes in primary or secondary plant metabolites could be associated to the disease development and interaction with pests (Vänninen et al. 2010, Johansen et al. 2011, Vänninen et al. 2012).”
- In the light of new greenhouse technologies: 2. Direct effects of artificial lighting on arthropods and integrated pest management in greenhouse crops (2011, background): “…saving include UVabsorbing, near-infrared (NIR) blocking, fluorescent and ultrathermic films, films with different photoselective pigments (other than UV-absorbing) and panes with different transmission and insulation properties (Antignus, 2000; Vänninen et al., 2010 and references therein).”