Shifts in phenology due to global climate change: the need for a yardstick

By M. Visser, C. Both. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences, 2005

1,536 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/69868df0df320b2dd36f73a2fd727739bb2fe4c4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

Citations in the corpus

Do growing degree days predict phenology across butterfly species (2015, background): “As yet, there is no simple and reliable approach to predict phenological shifts across multiple species (Visser and Both 2005) and biogeographic regions.”
Advancing breeding phenology in response to environmental change in a wild red deer population (2011, background): “…of phenological responses to climate change hinges on the availability of longitudinal data and the ability to examine the consequences of phenological changes for reproductive fitness and demographic rates at the individual level (Visser & Both, 2005; Gienapp et al., 2008; Visser, 2008).”
Functional and Phylogenetic Approaches to Forecasting Species' Responses to Climate Change (2012, background): “However, mismatches in phenological shifts between interacting species are frequently observed (Visser & Both 2005).”
Behavioural responses to human‐induced environmental change (2011, background): “…the advancement in breeding date of migratory birds due to climate change has resulted in mismatches with the seasonal availability of food for several populations, due to responses to climate change varying across trophic levels (Stenseth et al., 2002; Visser & Both, 2005; Both et al., 2009).”
Predicting adaptation of phenology in response to climate change, an insect herbivore example (2007, background): “r 2007 The Authors 1596 Journal compilation r 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd on one another, such as a herbivore and its host plant, react differently to an increase in temperature, thus leading to asynchrony or a mismatch (Bale et al., 2002; Stenseth & Mysterud, 2002; Visser et al., 2004; Visser & ”
Influence of experimental warming and shading on host–parasitoid synchrony (2010, background): “…climate change on biodiversity is the extent to which interacting species may alter their phenologies to different degrees, leading to mis-matches between herbivores and plants, predators and prey, and hosts and parasitoids (Buse & Good, 1996; Sparks & Yates, 1997; reviewed by Visser & Both, 2005).”
Phenotypic changes in spring arrival: evolution, phenotypic plasticity, effects of weather and condition (2007, background): “Yet, the observed changes have rarely been of the same magnitude as those in their prey species, which has led to an asynchrony between the demand for food and its availability (reviewed by Visser et al. 2004, Visser & Both 2005).”
Has Prey Availability for Arctic Birds Advanced with Climate Change? Hindcasting the Abundance of Tundra Arthropods Using Weather and Seasonal Variations (2009, background): “The seasonal pattern of arthropod surface activity is thus a yardstick against which to evaluate changes in phenology of animal groups that depend on them (Visser and Both, 2005).”
How does climate warming affect plant-pollinator interactions? (2009, background): “It is, however, reasonable to believe that plants and pollinators may have different mechanisms underlying their phenology and respond to different environmental cues (Visser & Both 2005).”