Controlling Baseline Trend in Single-Case Research.

By Richard I. Parker, Judy Cryer, G. Byrns. 2006

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/69848127e0f0333c84aba3e63a746742a3fecc53

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Smith
2. Kimberly J. Vannest
3. Richard I. Parker
4. B. Cavanaugh

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Kimberly J. Vannest
2. Richard I. Parker
3. J. Smith
4. John L. Davis
5. Andreas Lenz
6. W. Shadish

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Kimberly J. Vannest
2. J. Smith
3. Richard I. Parker
4. Leanne Brown
5. Andreas Lenz
6. John L. Davis
7. W. Shadish
8. Daniel F. Brossart

Citations in the corpus

• Single-Case Experimental Designs: A Systematic Review of Published Research and Current Standards (2012, methodology): “The effect of baseline trend on visual analysis, and a technique to control baseline trend, are offered by Parker et al. (2006).”
• The Improvement Rate Difference for Single-Case Research (2009, background): “In a recent survey of over 150 published single-case research datasets, 25% showed small, debatable, or negligible results, according to both visual and statistical analysis (Parker et al., 2006).”