Landscape effects of forest loss in a pollination system

By Hisatomo Taki, P. Kevan, J. Ascher. Landscape Ecology, 2007

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Factors affecting bee communities in forest openings and adjacent mature forest (2017, background): “While research has shown that some species are associated with late-successional habitats (Taki et al., 2007; Winfree et al., 2007b), most species are thought to prefer open, earlysuccessional habitats (Michener, 2007).”
Pollination services are mediated by bee functional diversity and landscape context (2015, background): “During springtime the understory herbs and shrubs in forests of eastern North America are important pollen and nectar resources for the primary wild bee groups in orchards: the andrenids and bumble bee queens (Taki et al., 2007; Watson et al., 2011).”
Diversity patterns of wild bees and wasps in managed boreal forests: Effects of spatial structure, local habitat and surrounding landscape (2015, background): “Species diversity in agricultural sites has been shown to increase with proximity to forests (Schuepp et al. 2011; Taki et al. 2007).”
Confronting collinearity: comparing methods for disentangling the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation (2009, unknown): “selection routine 14 11 3 0 5 Bartuszevige et al. (2006), Dodd et al. (2006), Drolet et al. (1999), Hamer et al. (2006), Hendrickx et al. (2007), Langlois et al. (2001), Magness et al. (2006), Radford and Bennett (2004), Radford and Bennett (2007), Reunanen et al. (2002), Rompre et al. (2007), Rosen”