Some comments on the use of cone calorimeter data

By B. Schartel, Matthias Bartholmai, U. Knoll. 2005

327 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Polymers and Plastics, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/68ed6fe06ec55c82a1cb2d0d76ba67d26a7ed604

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Polymers and Plastics

1. Chuck Zhang
2. Matthew Bundy
3. A. Morgan
4. C. Papaspyrides

In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

1. Matthew Bundy
2. A. Morgan

Citations in the corpus

• Polymer/layered silicate (clay) nanocomposites: An overview of flame retardancy (2010, unknown): “[86] Schartel B, Bartholmai M, Knoll U.”
• Cone calorimeter analysis of UL‐94 V‐rated plastics (2007, background): “It is important to note that experimental conditions for cone calorimeter testing are essential in understanding of the data, since the experimental conditions greatly affect the results of the test, as well as possible interpretation [28,29].”
• Study of fire retardant behavior of carbon nanotube membranes and carbon nanofiber paper in carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites (2010, methodology): “[25] Schartel B, Bartholmai M, Knoll U.”