Cone calorimeter analysis of UL‐94 V‐rated plastics

By A. Morgan, Matthew Bundy. 2007

225 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Polymers and Plastics, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3180848625512ad688bf3b838d8529fd7029a921

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Polymers and Plastics

1. J. Lopez‐Cuesta
2. C. Papaspyrides
3. Yiu-Wing Mai
4. A. Dasari
5. Zhongzhen Yu
6. Guipeng Cai
7. P. Kiliaris
8. V. Mittal

In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

1. J. Lopez‐Cuesta
2. C. Papaspyrides
3. Yiu-Wing Mai
4. A. Dasari
5. Zhongzhen Yu
6. Guipeng Cai
7. P. Kiliaris

Citations in the corpus

• Recent developments in the fire retardancy of polymeric materials (2013, background): “Morgan and Bundy [125], comparing the fire performance of different polymeric systems via cone calorimeter and UL 94 vertical burning techniques, showed that in some cases, similar to HRR0, average HRR at 60 s also agreed with V-UL 94 data, but only in a large sense; that is, it was hard to differen”
• Polymer/layered silicate (clay) nanocomposites: An overview of flame retardancy (2010, background): “The viscous melts of nanocomposites, nonetheless, present limited tendency to drip, keeping the polymer in place to feed the flame [14,109,118].”
• Flame retardancy of silicone-based materials (2009, background): “The cone calorimeter, if so configured, can also measure and quantify smoke output as well as CO/CO2 release rates [115].”