Collective Reactions to Threat: Implications for Intergroup Conflict and for Solving Societal Crises

By Immo Fritsche, E. Jonas, Thomas Kessler. 2011

184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/68d1321730fe06628df96b3d0cc35df073e26195

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Kyle Nash
2. T. Proulx
3. Immo Fritsche
4. E. Jonas
5. Johannes Klackl
6. Markus Quirin
7. Dmitrij Agroskin
8. J. Lammers

In Social Psychology

1. Kyle Nash
2. T. Proulx
3. Immo Fritsche
4. Ian M McGregor
5. E. Jonas
6. Johannes Klackl
7. Janka I. Stoker
8. Markus Quirin

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Ian M McGregor
2. Immo Fritsche
3. Kyle Nash
4. E. Jonas
5. Johannes Klackl
6. Janka I. Stoker
7. Markus Quirin
8. Dmitrij Agroskin

Citations in the corpus

• Threat and defense: From anxiety to approach (2014, background): “The goal regulation basis of the BIS activation is further demonstrated by findings that vocational, relationship, and mortality threats do not cause defensiveness when framed in a way that preserves unconflicted personal control (Fritsche et al., 2008, 2011; Fritsche, Jonas, Klackl, &Decker, 2013).”
• Leading and Working From Home in Times of COVID-19: On the Perceived Changes in Leadership Behaviors (2021, background): “Such situations of crises obviously affect both managers and employees because crises create uncertainty and stress, and thereby affect behaviors (Fritsche et al., 2011).”