Habitat quality of wildflower strips for common voles (Microtus arvalis) and its relevance for agriculture
By T. Briner, Wolfgang Nentwig, J. Airoldi. 2005
95 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/68a55dab8b274671d068db0538fa1126d8658bae
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Wildflower areas within revitalized agricultural matrices boost small mammal populations but not breeding Barn Owls (2010, methodology): “These ECAs have been shown to enhance ‘‘beneficial’’ organisms (e.g. Revaz et al. 2008) and also the abundance of agricultural pests such as voles (Microtus spp.; Tattersall et al. 1997, 2000; Briner et al. 2005; Aschwanden et al. 2007).”
- Small mammals in agricultural landscapes: Opposing responses to farming practices and landscape complexity (2011, background): “Hence potentially negative effects of conventional farming were compensated by immigration from semi-natural habitats in complex landscapes presumably due to active habitat selection (Briner et al., 2005; Tew et al., 2000).”
- Structure and diversity of small mammal communities in agriculture landscape (2007, background): “In the last decade, ecological compensation areas, such as wildflower strips, or the setaside scheme whereby arable land is temporarily taken out of production, have been widely promoted in European agriculture (Briner et al., 2005; Tattersall et al., 2000).”
- Wildflower plantings enhance the abundance of natural enemies and their services in adjacent blueberry fields (2015, background): “Wildflower plantings established to help conserve natural enemy populations may provide resources and habitat for insect (Lavandero et al., 2006; Wäckers et al., 2007) and vertebrate herbivores (Briner, 2005).”
- Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates. (2006, background): “However, it is still used commonly both for comparative purposes (Kelt & van Vuren 2001; Perry & Garland 2002; Jetz et al. 2004; Kjellander et al. 2004; Herfindal et al. 2005) as well as in single population studies ( Briner, Nentwig & Airoldi 2005; McCarthy, Fuller & Munkhtsog 2005; Preatoni et al”