Measuring Mobile Phone Use: Self-Report Versus Log Data

By Jeffrey Boase, Rich Ling. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun., 2013

420 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Approximately 40% of mobile phone use studies published in scholarly communication journals base their findings on self-report data about how frequently respondents use their mobile phones. Using a subset of a larger representative sample we examine the validity of this type of self-report data by comparing it to server log data. The self-report data correlate only moderately with the server log data, indicating low criterion validity. The categorical self-report measure asking respondents to estimate “how often” they use their mobile phones fared better than the continuous self-report measure asking them to estimate their mobile phone activity “yesterday.” A multivariate exploratory analysis further suggests that it may be difficult to identify under- and overreporting using demographic variables alone.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Management Science and Operations Research, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/686ae126f488a024ab06fcef487625145c8595c3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

  1. Jacob T. Fisher
  2. Brittany I. Davidson
  3. Daniel S. Quintana
  4. Douglas A. Parry
  5. C. Sewall
  6. Hannah Mieczkowski
  7. Jacob E. Barkley
  8. Andrew Lepp

In Management Science and Operations Research

  1. Jacob E. Barkley
  2. Michael Scharkow
  3. Leonard Reinecke
  4. Aryn C. Karpinski
  5. Andrew Lepp
  6. Á. Miklósi
  7. Ernst H. W. Koster

In Transportation

  1. Jacob E. Barkley
  2. Michael Scharkow
  3. Aryn C. Karpinski
  4. Andrew Lepp

Citations in the corpus