The Moral Foundations taxonomy: Structural validity and relation to political ideology in Sweden

By Artur Nilsson, Arvid Erlandsson. 2015

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/68560989ec54a6e9453eca5f71c087eff032a148

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Mehmet Harma
2. Kevin B. Smith
3. S. Cesur
4. Nicholas G. Martin
5. J. Alford
6. John R. Hibbing
7. Onurcan Yılmaz
8. P. Hatemi

In Social Psychology

1. Mehmet Harma
2. Kevin B. Smith
3. S. Cesur
4. Nicholas G. Martin
5. J. Alford
6. John R. Hibbing
7. Onurcan Yılmaz
8. P. Hatemi

In Sociology and Political Science

1. P. Hatemi
2. Kevin B. Smith
3. Nicholas G. Martin
4. J. Alford
5. John R. Hibbing
6. Onurcan Yılmaz
7. John T. Jost
8. Christopher T. Dawes

Citations in the corpus

• Validation of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire in Turkey and its relation to cultural schemas of individualism and collectivism (2016, background): “This inconsistency is considered to be due to the complex nature ofmoral judgments (see Davies et al., 2014; Nilsson & Erlandsson, 2015 for similar discussions).”
• Intuitive Ethics and Political Orientations: Testing Moral Foundations as a Theory of Political Ideology (2017, methodology): “We tested these causal pathways by first estimating structural equation models of the longitudinal relationships between all of the individual moral foundations and political ideology dimensions in Mplus 6.12 (Muthén and Muthén 1998–2011).”