What Explains the Variation in Estimates of Labour Supply Elasticities?

By Michiel Evers, Ruud A. De Mooij, D. Vuuren. Social Science Research Network, 2006

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper performs a meta-analysis of empirical estimates of uncompensated labour supply elasticities. We find that much of the variation in elasticities can be explained by the variation in gender, participation rates, and country fixed effects. Country differences appear to be small though. There is no systematic impact of the model specification or marital status on reported elasticities. The decision to participate is more responsive than is the decision regarding hours worked. Even at the intensive margin, we find that the elasticity for women exceeds that for men. For men and women in the Netherlands, we predict an uncompensated labour supply elasticity of 0.1 (or 0.2 if an alternative specification is preferred) and 0.5, respectively. These values are robust for alternative samples and specifications of the meta regression.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67f49477a04fa8ab9770cb73d3cd28c8582756c3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. D. Chatman
  2. Robert B. Noland
  3. Robert Cervero
  4. Kent M. Hymel
  5. William A. Cowart

In Gender Studies

  1. Robert B. Noland
  2. D. Chatman

In General Health Professions

  1. Robert B. Noland
  2. D. Chatman

Citations in the corpus