Privatization, Competition, and Budget Constraints: Disciplining Enterprises in Russia

By John S. Earle, Saul Estrin. 2003

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67e29f13af68b36bb840efcfe9c61653908c8351

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. J. Kornai
2. Gérard Roland
3. Eric Maskin
4. Saul Estrin
5. K. Meyer
6. Mike W. Peng
7. David B. Audretsch
8. Maksim Belitski

In Strategy and Management

1. J. Kornai
2. Gérard Roland
3. Eric Maskin
4. Saul Estrin
5. K. Meyer
6. Alvaro Cuervo‐Cazurra

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding the Soft Budget Constraint (2003, methodology): “A similarly lopsided proxy is used to describe the SBC-effect in Earle and Estrin (1998), EBRD (1999) and World Bank (2002).”
• From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization (2001, unknown): “In spite of this, Nicholas Barberis, Maxim Boycko, Andrei Shleifer, and Natalia Tsukanova (1996), Earle (1998) and Earle and Estrin (1998) all document that privatization was associated with performance improvements in firms that were divested during the mass privatization program of the early…”
• Competition and Corporate Governance in Transition (2002, background): “Even so, Earle and Estrin (1998) find Russia's fourfirm concentration ratios in 1994 have a mean of around 27 percent with a standard deviation of 21.6 percent.”